Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 September 21

September 21 edit

Template:Climate of India by state or territory edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 October 1. Izno (talk) 17:27, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Oldham Loop Line edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 03:38, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This was using a base template that is to be deleted by TFD which I converted to a prose description since it didn't look like changing it to use {{sidebar}} would be appropriate. It was used on only 3 pages, which can be seen in my contributions. (Woops, shouldn't have substed it.) Izno (talk) 23:00, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete No longer used. Substitution already occurred. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:09, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BTC City Ljubljana riders edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:47, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Team is defunct, so the template is no longer required. Craig(talk) 22:24, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Missouri Democratic primary, 2008 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 September 30. plicit 03:40, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Andrew Yang series edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 October 3. Primefac (talk) 15:14, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Content of Matthew edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 15:06, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use navigation template. I don't see any reason to do anything like subst it because the section it's used in seems like a reasonable WP:SUMMARY style article Izno (talk) 22:05, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete It feels the entire sidebar is just links to a list of topics on Christianity than having to do with Matthew specifically. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:07, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Inc-alumni edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:27, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This sparsely-used template is a magnet for misunderstandings of the difference between an incomplete list and a dynamic list. Notable alumni lists are dynamic lists, and as such they should almost always be tagged with {{Dynamic list}}, not as an incomplete list. Looking through spot checks of the 24 current transclusions, most are misuses of this type, whereas only a handful are appropriate. It's not worth keeping the template around for just that tiny handful when {{Incomplete list}} would work just as well. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 21:33, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Exoplanet proj navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 03:43, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mainly redlinks, and only transcluded within the user space of its creator, who has been banned since 2014. – Fayenatic London 21:11, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:George Lopez edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 September 29. plicit 03:44, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:KBL color edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:48, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused color template. Gonnym (talk) 10:00, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Basketball color edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Basketball color. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:51, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The following templates all use the same module call of {{#invoke:Sports color|color|sport=basketball}} and produce the same result:

The templates should be replaced with {{Basketball color}} and either deleted or redirected. See previous TfDs: NBA color and BIC Basket color. --Gonnym (talk) 09:56, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • redirect is probably the simplest solution. Frietjes (talk) 15:07, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pun generator edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by Materialscientist (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 10:15, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense template not connected to any article. Whiteguru (talk) 07:04, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Football NSW Super League edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 03:41, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This template is now a subset of a more comprehensive and up-to-date Template called Template:National Premier Leagues NSW 2. Matilda Maniac (talk) 02:29, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

posted a link to this thread at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Australia task force to hopefully get more relevant feedback. Matilda Maniac (talk) 03:56, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).