Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 October 31

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< October 30 November 1 >

October 31 edit

Template:Chris Coons series edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:40, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why does this template exist other than the fact that Senator Coons holds President Biden's old Senate seat? Unknown0124 (talk) 23:56, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete There's no navigational benefit with this. All links outside the main article are to the article sections. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:09, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Normally there's at least some navigational value to these political series' that justifies its existence. This one, however, has literally 0 navigational value; every link points to either Coons article, or is a completely irrelevant link. Curbon7 (talk) 01:39, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Taxobox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:40, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused here after 8 years. Izno (talk) 23:25, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Big Two Comic Publisher edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:06, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and articles listed have their own navboxes or are already in the more broad navbox of Template:Comic book publishers in North America. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:40, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Billboard Philippines edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G6 by Materialscientist (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:06, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and no articles in the navbox. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:40, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Binibining Pilipinas titleholders edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:06, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:40, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, can be recreated if needed. Frietjes (talk) 15:16, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Biografia infotaula automatikoa edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:06, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not a template nor an infobox. Completely doesn't follow any standard of formatting. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:40, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Biota table header edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:07, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Both unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:40, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, can be recreated if needed. Frietjes (talk) 15:15, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BugineseE edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 November 8. Izno (talk) 17:07, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:List of regencies and cities of West Java edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:08, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and a navbox, Template:West Java, already features the same list of articles. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:24, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Year from to edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:08, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:12, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, can be recreated if needed. Frietjes (talk) 15:12, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Year in the Republic of China edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:08, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:12, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:YYYY elections in the United States by state or territory category header edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 November 8. Izno (talk) 17:09, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:YYYY in demonym sport edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:43, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:12, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:United Nations System edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:09, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A template that was deleted back on June 2, 2019, for partially overlapping with the UN navbox. All the links here are already on the navbox. Unnecessary fork. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:59, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Arona–Novara railway diagram edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:13, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All unused, redundant as the respective article has the route information already, or like the TransLink Diagram, are an unused fork of a template that's used on the mainspace article. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:46, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hockeyreference edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Hockey-reference. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:11, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to Template:Hockey-reference. Template:Hockey-reference was made in 2008 while Template:Hockeyreference was made in 2015. As hockeyreference.com used to be the URL in 2008, I think a redirect to Template:Hockey-reference could be useful here. Otherwise, Template:Hockeyreference is currently unused while Hockey-reference is used. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 19:07, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mo Brothers edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was history merge. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:10, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Mo Brothers with Template:The Mo Brothers.
Template:Mo Brothers was created in 2014 while Template:The Mo Brothers was created in 2021. As the article name is at The Mo Brothers, I think Mo Brothers template should be merged to The Mo Brothers template. Also, the template used at The Mo Brothers is Template:The Mo Brothers, while Template:Mo Brothers is unused. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 18:46, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Mo Brothers. There's nothing to merge. Templates are basically the same. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:08, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:IMDb Anton Leader edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:42, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This template is redundant with Template:IMDb name. Also, the template that is used at Anton Leader is IMDb name, not this custom template. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 17:57, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have been invited to this discussion, but cannot contribute as I have no idea what user MrLinkinPark333 is talking about in the Wikipedia-speak above. I defended my use of IMDb as a source of Mr. Leader's credits on the talk page of the entry I created for him. Beyond that, I can't really help with this discussion. Do as you feel you must, guys and gals. --Jhoughton1 (talk) 17:56, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:British Girls Adult Film Database movie edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:41, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and redundant to Template:IAFD movie. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:04, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:British Army Volunteers edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Materialscientist (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:06, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and all the articles in the template already have a respective navbox for their respective military unit/division. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:58, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:British Isles mathematicians edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:38, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and only links to categories. Not useful. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:56, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Beaufort scale small edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 November 7. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:37, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Beaufort scale template edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:38, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and redundant the article on the Beaufort scale already has detailed information on the scale. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:36, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Antiandrogens marketed for clinical or veterinary use edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:37, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and should most likely be substituted on appropriate articles. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:25, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Tennis at multi-sport competitions edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete after proper replacement with the new singular template. Primefac (talk) 21:25, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to Template:Infobox tennis tournament event (all transclusions replaced). Sod25 (talk) 13:19, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep user substituted all templates without a discussion. These are used for MSE events per WP:MSE, and should not be replaced with single sport templates/infoboxes. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 13:30, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @Sportsfan 1234: Template:Infobox tennis tournament event and Template:Infobox tennis tournament year are the standard infoboxes on every single tennis draw and every single tennis tournament edition article, except for multi-sport events until now. All these templates are now entirely redundant to the standard tennis templates. Not just redundant, but inferior - the standard tennis template can list winners/runners-up, scores, and has succession links, whereas these don't: compare this (old) to this (new). Sod25 (talk) 13:46, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    The infoboxes above can include the score. There is zero reason to be listing a runner up in these. Keep in mind this is a tennis tournament at a larger MSE event, not a tennis tournament by itself. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 13:54, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    They are tennis tournaments, and fall under the umbrella of WP:Tennis (as well as WP:MSE and others). The tennis infoboxes should be on the tennis tournament/event pages and are superior in functionality to all of these - you didn't address the succession links, which have logic specialized to tennis and specific tracking categories for the maintenance of all tennis tournament/event articles across Wikipedia. Also check the source of the "old" version linked above - there are params for score/champ but the template doesn't display them. Mass-reverting to inferior templates is simply disruptive. Sod25 (talk) 14:08, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per above, similar to other multi-sports events pages in all other sports, see no reason to make Tennis an exemption. Mohsen1248 (talk) 13:49, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @Mohsen1248, please see above. Also tennis is already being treated as an exception on the latest Olympic pages, which are the most-viewed (edit: tennis) MSEs. Sod25 (talk) 13:55, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Then someone has to create the templates for the Olympic Tennis events as well. because as I said I see no reason to make Tennis an exemption and who says Tennis pages "are the most-viewed MSEs" ? even if that's true (which I believe you just made that up) it doesn't change anything. my question stands, why Tennis should be an exception? Mohsen1248 (talk) 15:06, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I meant the "most-viewed tennis MSEs". Tennis should be an exception because these two templates are standard across all 8,000+ tennis tournament pages and 16,000+ singles/doubles pages, and they provide greater functionality than the listed templates, the most significant being succession links with logic specific to tennis pages and tracking categories for the maintenance of tennis articles across Wikipedia. Also, there are potentially hundreds more of these templates that haven't yet been created but could, e.g. 19 more "TennisatXXXXSEAsianGames". Having 2 templates with the functionality of all of these saves editor time (no need to create a new template for every tournament), and makes maintenance easier (modifications/improvements only need to be made to 1-2 templates instead of 27+). Sod25 (talk) 15:49, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all Navboxes are already provided to navigate between the respective tournaments or are linked on the main tennis articles for the events. All fall under creep and crust. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:20, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Navboxes (or do you mean Infoboxes?) do not link to the other events as part of the sport's competition at the said event. Also the qualification link is missing. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 14:47, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    These issues have now been addressed, see Talk:Tennis at the 2019 Pan American Games#Navbox. Sod25 (talk) 08:54, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment I'd also like to point out that discussing 20+ templates used on articles ranging and notability and quality is also a bad idea. Perhaps discussing each event on its own (and said templates) would be a better idea. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 14:49, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, the new system is clearly superior since you (1) don't need to create a template for every event, and (2) you can include more information, like the score, champion, etc. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:35, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete per Sod25 and Plastikspork. Frietjes (talk) 15:08, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
COMMENT I am not going to comment on the 'new system', I can see its advantages. However, I do think WP:MSE must be consulted and a resolution agreeing to these changes through a consensus needs to be raised before any of these templates are deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sportsfan 1234 (talk • contribs) 22:32, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I did do my due diligence with WP:MSE by inviting them to join this discussion [1], but none took up the offer. That in my opinion suffices for having been "consulted". As for the demand of a "resolution [by them] agreeing to these changes through a consensus" before deletion, I'm not sure individual projects have that kind of jurisdiction over any page outside their project-space. If others deem otherwise so be it, but I won't be able to comment further. I believe I've clearly outlined the benefits of the two infoboxes over these 27+ navboxes, so will leave it to the powers that be to decide the outcome from here. Sod25 (talk) 04:21, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Sod25 and Plastikspork. The new system is far superior to the now unused and pointless sea of templates. Newshunter12 (talk) 19:16, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:National University of Colombia edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:45, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. All entries are campuses of a university, which currently redirect to the university. Geschichte (talk) 11:00, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete No navigation provided. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:20, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: unnecessary template that provides no navigation. The campuses outside Bogota are small regional outposts and not significant enough for their own articles, hence the redirects. Richard3120 (talk) 18:11, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:O. Schwarz edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 04:50, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a board that no one uses at all. Did Q28 make a mess today? 03:35, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:F+ edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 04:49, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Templates that are barely used, if used, should be substed and then deleted. Did Q28 make a mess today? 03:31, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:F− edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 04:46, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Templates that are barely used, if used, should be substed and then deleted. Did Q28 make a mess today? 03:30, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sd-spam edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 04:45, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The quick delete prompt has been replaced by another template, so we don't need this one. Did Q28 make a mess today? 03:29, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Talkvandal edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 November 7. Izno (talk) 04:45, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Oldafdfull/old edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 04:45, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This template is obsolete and we should delete it. Did Q28 make a mess today? 03:16, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Stencil edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 04:45, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This template is not very useful, so I think it is better to delete it. Did Q28 make a mess today? 03:15, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Listrow edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 04:44, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The template is only used on one page and has been substed and should be deleted. Did Q28 make a mess today? 03:14, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Not really used anywhere except on a talk page. No substitution is necessary. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:43, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tennis topic/old edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 04:44, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This template is obsolete, so we don't need to use it. Did Q28 make a mess today? 03:12, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject 2020s edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G8 by Liz (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject is not really "inactive", it does not exist and does not have any consensus for existing (see discussion on Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/WikiProject 2020s). Therefore this tag on talkpages doesn't really help anyone. Elli (talk | contribs) 01:05, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Useless edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:17, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Self-depreciating but if used elsewhere really just a personal attack. Barkeep49 (talk) 00:14, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy delete in my view hence it kind of counts as a personal attack under G10. But delete nonetheless. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:44, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – I fail to see any way in which this template could be conducive to building an encyclopedia. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 02:58, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per the above comments, and the fact that anyone could just type it out, regardless if it's an attack. This template is useless, pun not intended. WADDLES 🍁 🎃 03:23, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_October_31&oldid=1054934807"