Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 October 28

October 28 edit

Template:ScriptureTranscludeSource500 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 08:48, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, appears to be some sort of test or a copy from another language's WP. This is the creator's only edit at en.WP, and their only edit listed in their global contributions. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:48, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Not needed. A one-off creation. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:06, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not necessary. Nothing were available in this template. Fade258 (talk) 04:57, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:English cricket seasons 1946 - 1968 and three sibling templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 08:48, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, superseded by Template:English cricket seasons per this discussion from 2016. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:25, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as per nom, has been superceded. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:54, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Per nom, and Joseph2302's comments. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 09:09, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox college nepal edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 08:48, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

unused fork Frietjes (talk) 16:07, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Uw-attack1-short edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 November 5. plicit 08:48, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Election box gain with party link and percentage edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 08:48, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Created three years ago and is used only once in its creator's sandbox. Would have been in use by now if it were needed. Gonnym (talk) 11:40, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Uw-attack1-rand edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 November 4. plicit 10:52, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:R1 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 November 13. Primefac (talk) 09:02, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Football/hide edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 15:45, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to be just text and nothing else. It's not a standard feature of WikiProjects. I also am not sure the rationale stated as the template was created in 2008 and our features have changed significantly since then. Basically I am proposing deletion because it's harmful to have inaccurate content around, and makes maintenance harder and more time consuming. So I propose deletion. This is a test edit as there is a set of 14 or so similar templates (as compared with the hundreds of WP templates around). Tom (LT) (talk) 05:46, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:19, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Relist with the 12 or so other similar templates (there are a couple of false positives in that search result), which do not appear to do anything, but we could be wrong. None of them have any transclusions. It is difficult to believe that they have a function at this time; they clearly used to do something, but their functionality appears to have been replaced with updated code somewhere. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:05, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • 'Delete not needed. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:51, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).