Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 October 25

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< October 24 October 26 >

October 25 edit

Template:North Kosovo elections edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:57, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A template that links only one article about an election in North Kosovo. The rest are articles about elections in Kosovo, the largely unrecognized country that Serbia claims as part of its territory. Not the region it already controls, North Kosovo. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:00, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: Kosovo is a unitary system, so I wouldn't expect this to get very much additional use anyways. Side note but 50% of the UN recognizes Kos, so it's only half-unrecognized lol. Curbon7 (talk) 00:17, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pakistan local elections, 2013–15 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these templates. Primefac (talk) 14:51, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Islamabad and the Japanese elections subpage are both unused. Both the Islamabad and Pakistan local elections contain very few links to justify having a navbox. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:00, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Birinci Lig champions edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:58, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and contains only one link to an actual team's season. Everything else is links to Football teams. No benefit is presented. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:33, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bismilla edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:58, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not a template. Just unused text. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:28, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Anglican Church of Chile edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these templates. Primefac (talk) 14:48, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

After creating their talk pages and adding them to at least one article, upon examination of the links in the templates, both contain mainly redirects with two or three actual articles. Not enough for navboxes. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:25, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Noida Secondary Schools edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. Primefac (talk) 14:49, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Two articles have been deleted, one through Afd, the other through PROD. One redirect and one link. Template is no longer useful. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:29, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Al-Ameen educational institutes edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:52, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All listings on this template were PROD'd and deleted. Template no longer used on any articles. Liz Read! Talk! 19:56, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Prognosis edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:52, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

only used on one talk page Frietjes (talk) 19:25, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Beys of the Umuroğlu tribe (Diriliş: Ertuğrul) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:45, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

single-use template, can be merged with the parent article and deleted Frietjes (talk) 19:20, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Somewat Usefull edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:50, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Untranscluded, non-standard attempt at a userbox or user page decoration. Unnecessary maintenance burden. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:57, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bishops of Santiago edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:50, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and two links. Both articles are already featured on Template:Bishops in the Anglican Province of Chile. One that is being used and has enough links for a navbox. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:09, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bishop's College School edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:50, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused with only two links. Not enough for a navbox. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:09, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, the two articles are already well-connected. Frietjes (talk) 15:33, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Belgian Third Division edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:50, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An unused fork of Template:Belgian Third Division seasons. Both created by the same user. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:49, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Autism Welcome edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:50, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not used by the project. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:45, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • weak delete, looks like this was last used in 2019. Frietjes (talk) 15:32, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Malta-Three edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:50, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

unused after I replaced it in Template:Malta-Three-Cities and Template:Malta-Three-Villages Frietjes (talk) 15:39, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Applewel edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:49, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not used by the project. Most likely was substituted years ago by the project welcoming new members. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:29, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

delete, as far as I can tell this was last used in 2010. Frietjes (talk) 15:29, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:HSL2 Route edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:40, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and near duplicate of {{HSL 2}}. Mackensen (talk) 13:37, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:User:Larryzhao123/fs game X edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:10, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A user has created his user page in the template namespace. Userfy is probably the best choice. Here's 28 and did I make a mess? 00:09, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I don't think userfy is necessary as the user who created this has been blocked indefinitely. Not sure what good it would do. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:20, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Space/code edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:06, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to be a template that has been abandoned. Here's 28 and did I make a mess? 00:05, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_October_25&oldid=1053244829"