Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 October 18

October 18 edit

Template:Bahujan Republican Socialist Party/meta/color edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:26, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All unused. The Zac Goldsmith template is not of a political party. Just the name of a politician who lost the 2016 London Mayor's race. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:55, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Yeah looks like they are all unused and just single words. Perfecnot (talk) 14:09, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Professional Go players in Japan edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 October 26. Izno (talk) 00:28, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Unused Political Party shortname templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 October 26. Izno (talk) 00:28, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Defunct go board templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:27, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These templates are redundant to a better-designed template, specifically the ones in the Goban templates category. They are old prototypes and are unused. Coastside (talk) 21:48, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Relyear edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:28, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sparsely used template (6 transclusions) that seems redundant to {{Age}}. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 21:03, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Also sufficiently trivial that is doesn't really need to be a template in the first place. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:56, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect or Replace (per expired speedy criterion T3) to/with {{Age in years}}, which appears to perform the same function without modification and is part of a family of templates that is better-supported and better-documented. Also do the same to {{relmonth}} (to/with {{Age in months}}). – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:05, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:B. Traven edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 October 26. Izno (talk) 00:29, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:B-gone edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Jehochman (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 00:04, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and we don't use message templates like this on each other's talk pages as this one comes off as rude and unhelpful. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:43, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Autotestcase edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:29, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:39, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Globalisation barnstar/Doc edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:30, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, not needed. Template already contains standard documentation. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:33, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The Martial Arts Barnstar/Usage edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:30, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, inaccurate subpage. Documentation page contains correct usage information. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:31, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The Black Parade track listing edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:30, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. This is article content that is already in the article in a better, more complete format. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:20, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bx6 SBS BRT RDT edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Moved to Epicgenius user space. Izno (talk) 00:33, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, maintenance burden. Last dozen or so edits have been maintenance edits by bots and human editors. The article for this route already contains a more detailed table than this RDT provides. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:15, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bakerloo line extension via Camberwell RDT edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 October 26. Primefac (talk) 17:47, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Schools in Madhya Pradesh edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 October 26. Izno (talk) 00:34, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Organized crime in Chicago edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 21:51, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

merging completed to template:organized crime groups in Chicago Funandtrvl (talk) 04:42, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

propose deletion. --Funandtrvl (talk) 04:43, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Funandtrvl, merging has been done. No need for a deletion Tfd. You can withdraw this nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:49, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
deletion withdrawn, template redirected. --Funandtrvl (talk) 18:09, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).