Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 November 30

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< November 29 December 1 >

November 30 edit

Template:NYCS 14th IRT terminal edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep NYCS closed, delete everything else. Izno (talk) 15:14, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:21, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 22:28, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 21:50, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2022 FIFA World Cup qualification – CAF Second Round group tables edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 12. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:26, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Use Talossan English edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:58, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

English variety of a micronation; unused and is unlikely to be used. — Hydrogenation (talk) 20:52, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete This micronation exists in the U.S. so it's unlikely the English is that different that needs a template such as this. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:56, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete not a real nation, just like freemen-on-the-land, so no English variety found that isn't U.S. English. -- 65.92.246.43 (talk) 03:06, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Grant Broadcasters edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Australian Radio Network. Izno (talk) 15:15, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Grant Broadcasters with Template:Australian Radio Network.
Australian Radio Network's acquisition of Grant Broadcasters is expected to have been completed by November 30, 2021. ChocoMingo (talk) 20:25, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:STV Election box candidate2 with custom party edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 8. Izno (talk) 15:16, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Election winner list without party link edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:25, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused election table template. Gonnym (talk) 13:38, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Election summary minor party with leaders edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:24, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused election table template. Gonnym (talk) 13:38, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Election box winning candidate no party with winner edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:24, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused election table template. Gonnym (talk) 13:38, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Election box necessary edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:24, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused election table template. Gonnym (talk) 13:37, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Roman Catholic Ecclesiastical Province of Bordeaux edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:38, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused French Roman Catholic Ecclesiastical provinces templates which were superseded by Template:Catholic Church in France. Gonnym (talk) 11:21, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete All links are included in the Catholic Church in France template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:45, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:10, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Red link disguise edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:38, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is clearly not a template we should use. It uses the style of a valid blue link instead of the red link for non-existing pages. Gonnym (talk) 11:15, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:46, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment it's not even accurate, it sets a linkcolor, but does not check if it is a redlink. Delete -- 65.92.246.43 (talk) 16:54, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Portal/row edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:39, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused {{Portal}} subpages. Gonnym (talk) 11:08, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment have these capabilities been migrated into the module? -- 65.92.246.43 (talk) 16:55, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    That's a valid question which I don't have the answer, but seeing as how Template:Portal was converted into a module in 2013 and these are unused, I'm sure that if a feature was missing it would have been requested by now. Gonnym (talk) 17:07, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please delete: Thank you for finding these no longer used templates. Yours aye,  Buaidh  talk e-mail 17:43, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Celebrity Deathmatch edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:22, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NENAN. Has more "see also" links than works relevant to the main topic Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm probably leaning oppose here. There are 5 actual links of topics related to the series. I would however remove the see also section as it seems completely unrelated. Gonnym (talk) 06:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep, connects six articles. Frietjes (talk) 15:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The related links are to shows that have very little relation other than association because of Eric Fogel. If you count them out, there are only four links related to the show outside the template title. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    The template title counts, that's a valid link. Gonnym (talk) 08:56, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 08:45, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment The title is valid, but it's more about the links within the template that is the primary aid in navigation. And as TPH has stated, there is less of relevance to the main subject and most of the links have very little relation to each other. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:26, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WNBP todo edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:26, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, well… Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 07:08, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_November_30&oldid=1060030723"