Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 November 27

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< November 26 November 28 >

November 27 edit

Template:Country data Chinese Communist Party edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:03, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Country data templates are not used for political parties or organisations. Originally thought to merge with Template:Country data China, but that would set a precedent for merging political flags with country data, the implementation of which would be biased towards whatever party is ruling or dominant at the moment. Such a categorisation would not be in-line with Wikipedia policy, so I propose a deletion. CentreLeftRight ✉ 21:44, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Miss Universe Myanmar edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:51, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation template that no remaining navigation. All year links were redirected to the main Miss Universe Myanmar article per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Myanmar 2013. • Gene93k (talk) 16:18, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Find sources/links/archive.org edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Module:Find sources/links. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:50, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging the above with Module:Find sources/links.
The above modules hold config data for a specific search entry. Each entry is further split into a main module and a /autodoc module. These can all be merged into one config module, as I've done here, with relevant changes to Module:Find sources/sandbox and Module:Find sources/autodoc/sandbox. Gonnym (talk) 11:11, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge all per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:48, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge all. I originally made these separate modules so that non-template-editors could add their own links without making an edit request, but the proposed scheme is tidier, and adding links templates is a rare enough occurrence that it will probably not be a problem. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 01:02, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:MTime edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:12, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused wrapper around the {{#time}} function. It is better and clearer just to use the parser function directly. (TimeOffset is a subtemplate of this which just takes a substring so didn't need to be a seperate template anyway.) User:GKFXtalk 08:05, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tõlliste Parish edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:11, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the navigation box is used anymore. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 05:26, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Trapezoidnotation edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:11, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is mainly because it is not used. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 05:26, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - templates that effectively just insert a single image are not useful. User:GKFXtalk 11:35, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:48, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Too many boxes edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 4. ✗plicit 12:11, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Too small edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 05:08, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is worth noting that it is unused. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 05:05, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Timelines by year edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:10, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I always think that it is not used. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 05:04, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unused. User:GKFXtalk 11:31, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unused. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:48, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Timeline Australian Open Women's Singles Winners edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:10, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not use, guys. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:53, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tdy edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:22, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Because it is not used, we should delete it. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:46, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment how can you tell it is unused? It's clearly a substitution template. -- 65.92.246.43 (talk) 05:25, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - as noted by 65.92, there’s no proof this is unused. It seems useful so unless it’s redundant to something else it should be kept. User:GKFXtalk 11:29, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep agreed with GKFX. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:48, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:TTF tabs old edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:08, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, the template is not being used. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:42, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unused. User:GKFXtalk 11:33, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unused. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:48, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SwedishMilitaryRanks EnglishTranslation edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:08, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's no longer used! Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:40, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sectionanchor.hide.css edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:08, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I feel that this section should be deleted because it is not being used. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:34, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Who is this "We" you are speaking of? If this is a shared account, it should be disabled, and each of the "we"s calling themselves "Q28" should sign up for their own individual accounts. -- 65.92.246.43 (talk) 05:38, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I've changed the wording.--Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:26, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Regardless of any concerns about the nominator's identity, Delete as unused. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:48, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sectionanchor.css edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:09, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This template is not currently in use. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:34, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cmbox/styles.css edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 4. ✗plicit 12:09, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FAR history edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deleted by creator. DrKay (talk) 08:21, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's never been used, that's all. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 04:33, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment I'd like to know what tool that I can use to see tranclusion histories, to determine when a template has never been used. Can you point out what tool you are using? -- 65.92.246.43 (talk) 05:40, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment It was in use. It is no longer used because we now have a bot that does the same job automatically and so it is no longer necessary. Having no transclusions is not the same as never being used. The template is designed to be substituted and has only ever been used as a substitution. DrKay (talk) 08:17, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:JRowling edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move to /FAQ Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:49, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use talk page template. Either subst and delete, or move without redirect to something like Talk:J. K. Rowling/FAQ and transclude it from there. I favor the latter, as the point of putting this in a template is reducing the excessive front-matter source code at the top of the article's talk page. We just don't need anything like this in the template namespace since it has no other uses on any other pages and never will, not even on other articles connected to Rowling.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  03:17, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support - either moving or substing into talk space is fine. User:GKFXtalk 11:13, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Convert to FAQ and move to /FAQ page. This looks like a standard FAQ so should move to that page and use the relevant FAQ templates. Gonnym (talk) 12:00, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst into Talk:J. K. Rowling and then Delete, since it has only one transclusion. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:30, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Convert to /FAQ in my experience there are significant benefits to having separate revision histories for the FAQ on talk pages with a long list of perennial issues. But it should be in Talk space, not Template space. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 00:39, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Convert to /FAQ, per User:力. Mathglot (talk) 11:04, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:DemoTemplate edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:10, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Uh-oh, it's not being used. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 02:30, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep it's an example for the demo module. It's not supposed to be used ever. As long as the demo module exists, this template should continue to exist. -- 65.92.246.43 (talk) 05:41, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - contrary to 65.92’s comment, this does not appear to be an example of anything. It’s an unused, broken template wrapper for {{#invoke:DemoTemplate}}. The module was clearly designed for direct use so a wrapper is not necessary. User:GKFXtalk 11:21, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:26, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Duanwu edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:09, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's not being used, okay. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 02:29, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused wrapper around Template:Ctime:x. The code is simple enough ({{ctime:x|2021|5|5}} → 2021-06-14) that it can just be written out directly anywhere it is later required. User:GKFXtalk 11:25, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unused. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:48, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox/title.css edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:09, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So in fact, this templete was not used. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 02:01, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  Agree since the solution from this TemplateStyle is already integrated into MediaWiki. -- Great Brightstar (talk) 03:38, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox/biography-styles.css edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:09, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is not clear what this template is for and it is not being used. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 02:01, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox/styles.css edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:09, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, we did not use it. Q28 hope you pay attention to TFD 01:55, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_November_27&oldid=1058664299"