Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 November 22

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< November 21 November 23 >

November 22 edit

Template:Madhouse video games edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 09:00, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Both are just like the J.C.Staff video games template nominated below. J.C.Staff, Madhouse, and Toei Animation are not game developers or publishers, but animation studios that have done artwork for game studios and their games. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:03, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete both Not a strong enough relationship among the games themselves to warrant a navigation template. They are all made by different game studios. TarkusABtalk/contrib 01:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete both: I created the Madhouse navbox but just as an attempt to split all media from the massive Madhouse navbox. The reasoning of the nom is correct. --LoЯd ۞pεth 04:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Angel Road–Enfield Town line edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep Template:BMT Blue Mountains Line, userfy Template:Angel Road–Enfield Town line (User:PhiH/Angel Road–Enfield Town line), delete the remaining three. ✗plicit 09:06, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All unused and redundant as either the article for these train routes already have the route listed or the respective articles don't exist. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:06, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About the Angel Road–Enfield Town line: There has been some discussion about how we organise the Lea Valley lines and this template was a byproduct of it. I didn't really pursue this topic lately so I would like to move the template to my userspace because we may need it in the future. --PhiH (talk) 10:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per nom. No objection to userfying any individual templates. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all except Blue Mountains Line per nom. Bahnstreckenabschnitt Stuttgart Hbf–Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt was once used as a component of several diagrams such as the Fils Valley Railway RD, but these are now fully described. I am not sure why the Blue Mountains Line template isn't used in the Blue Mountains Line article.--Grahame (talk) 03:07, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep BMT Blue Mountains Line. I have now added a link in the Blue Mountains Line article, which was presumably intended in the first place, although its creator has retired.--Grahame (talk) 06:23, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Active departments of Al Zamalek SC edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:49, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and redundant in comparison to Template:Zamalek SC active sections. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:42, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Adelaide Plains Football League edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:49, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and no articles exist for the teams as they were redirected per an Afd for each of them. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:31, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:32TeamX3RoundBracket7 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:49, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused team bracket. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:25, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Racquetballbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 21:22, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sports match box template. Last edited 2019. User:GKFXtalk 21:17, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WPMUNWELCOME edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:51, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A welcome template that is no longer used. Did Q28 make a mess today? 10:24, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:14, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment did you discuss this with the wikiproject? It appears on their front page as part of the instructions. It would be unfriendly to not discuss this with WPMUNICH and WPGERMANY -- 65.92.246.43 (talk) 02:15, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • RENAME to WP:WikiProject Munich/Template:Welcome as this doesn't need to be in templatespace, it can just be in wikiprojectspace, and update the instructions to show this. Additionally, all current uses appear to be substitutions, so this should have a subst-only banner. -- 65.92.246.43 (talk) 02:17, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 21:15, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PRC admin/ref sgc edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:49, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This template produces broken links that seem not to be saved in the Internet Archive. The Chinese Wikipedia version (at zh:Template:PRC_admin/ref_stats.gov.cn) seems to have given up on the 2011 statistics and moved on to 2020. At least one article is citing the 2020 statistics with a plain {{cite web}} (Shuangta Subdistrict, Suzhou). That seems less error-prone: about half of the few articles I checked are using the template incorrectly, passing numbers to it with slashes when the template does not expect slashes. In a brief experiment, it seems that the codes passed to this template cannot be re-used against the 2020 website, so I'm uncertain what can be salvaged from it or if it should just be removed. Pinging User:Vikarna who says on the talk page they looked into it in case they have any insight. User:GKFXtalk 18:33, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I'd say remove it. Not much can be retained just from one article using the current statistics. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:26, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:OA-ness edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:48, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited 2012, seems to have been part of efforts to display open access icons (sample output  ). These are now available as part of the normal citation system, and this template is unused outside of its author's sandboxes. User:GKFXtalk 18:00, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Under Siege edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:46, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template links to only two articles; does not meet guidelines at MOS:FILM#Navigation. DoubleCross (‡) 17:43, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Looks like a reboot in the works, so maybe in the future, but until then... --Engineerchange (talk) 17:49, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not enough links. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:51, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not enough links....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Republic of China presidential elections edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 November 29. Izno (talk) 19:51, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Centuriesdatenote edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:57, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Used only in one category. There is no reason to keep it as a template and it should be subst to that category and deleted. Gonnym (talk) 10:23, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Simple fix edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:55, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If no one uses it, it will probably not continue to use it. Did Q28 make a mess today? 09:07, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Split message edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:55, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No one uses it. ` Did Q28 make a mess today? 09:05, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:New barnstar edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:55, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Most likely never used. Did Q28 make a mess today? 08:55, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Flow box edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:55, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We have never used the template. Did Q28 make a mess today? 08:54, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hockey team season records legend edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:54, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We never used it. Did Q28 make a mess today? 08:52, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:List preview edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:54, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, that's out of date. Did Q28 make a mess today? 08:51, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:53, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as unused and last edited 2009. User:GKFXtalk 21:35, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as unused. Being merely out of date is not a valid reason to delete something. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Belarus/to do edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:54, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a comment. Maybe it needs to move. Did Q28 make a mess today? 08:50, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Timeline of Folklore of the Ottoman Empire edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:54, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I still don't understand what this template is for. Did Q28 make a mess today? 08:49, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:RxCOTWnew edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:53, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete because no one is using it. Did Q28 make a mess today? 08:47, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WP South America/Categories edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:53, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No use. Well, that's all I can think of. Did Q28 make a mess today? 08:47, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Userbox sample edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:53, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if I need to delete it. Did Q28 make a mess today? 08:44, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • The purpose of it (15 years ago) was to be able to show the output of a userbox along with the source code for generating that userbox. It was used at one point in some of the userbox documentation. (But again, this is 15 years ago - the documentation is obviously not using it any more.) --B (talk) 11:50, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: {{Userbox sample compact}} is similar and has just one transclusion on an old sandbox. It could be substed and deleted. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:17, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I'd say substitute the template to avoid any potential screw up from outright deletion. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:53, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Another case in which neither delete !voter provides any argument for deletion at all. Delete as unused anyway. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:TMKOC edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:52, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not used, and probably too little for a navigation template. Did Q28 make a mess today? 08:43, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:TUDMCA edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:52, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what he's doing. Delete it. Did Q28 make a mess today? 08:43, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The big Wikiball edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:52, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Abandoned experiment from 2011. Never substed, apparently, and no transclusions. – Jonesey95 (talk) 07:10, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Progresso da Lunda Sul squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:52, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Empty, untranscluded template for defunct club. No "current roster" is possible, since the club does not exist anymore. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:54, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Nay orange edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:51, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. No links, no transclusions. Redundant to the better documented {{cross}}:  N. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:47, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Milk and Honey tracks edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:51, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yet another unused tracklist template Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:47, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:J.C.Staff video games edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:06, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

J.C. Staff is not a game developer or publisher, but an animation studio that has done artwork on contract for many game studios and their games. This list has been compiled by original research on a game-by-game basis. I cannot find sources that discuss these games "as a set". As a strong relationship between these games is not established in reliable sources, it violates WP:NAV. TarkusABtalk/contrib 02:18, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: I created the template as an attempt to split all media from a massive navbox of hundreds of links. However, I think that the nom's claim is more than valid. --LoЯd ۞pεth 05:21, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Minsk Electoral District deputies, 1917 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 November 29. Izno (talk) 19:45, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Don Cossack Region Electoral District deputies, 1917 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 November 29. Izno (talk) 19:45, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Viatka Electoral District deputies, 1917 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 November 29. Izno (talk) 19:45, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Penza Electoral District deputies, 1917 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 November 29. Izno (talk) 19:45, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_November_22&oldid=1057900340"