Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 November 10

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< November 9 November 11 >

November 10 edit

Template:NNMETRO color edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:07, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:18, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Notbot edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:08, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and the edit history may suggest this was more of a test template than to be used anywhere. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:14, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Cavalryman (talk) 04:01, 11 November 2021 (UTC).[reply]
  • Speedy delete – and thanks for taking care of this. I created this template eight years ago. It has never been used and for the life of me I have no idea why I did it or what it does. :) - Wikidemon (talk) 01:31, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Template:Nobots Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 01:40, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Nochiya Region edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:08, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sidebar. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:59, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Noc left edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:09, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and was abandoned since creation. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:59, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Non-metro train services in New Zealand edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:09, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and no links connecting what the template is for. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:55, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creator of the template here. I'm fine with this; I can't remember why I created it. YttriumShrew (talk) 22:59, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Northwest Territories Indigenous Governments edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:09, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and redundant as templates Aboriginal peoples in the Northwest Territories and Template:Communities of Northwest Territories are used connecting the articles in this template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:52, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Norethisterone metabolism edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:13, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Both single-use and should be substituted on the Norethisterone article. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:47, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:National Basketball League (Philippines) player edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:15, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:00, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NR topics edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:16, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused fork of Template:New Rochelle, New York. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:57, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NRL expansion edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:16, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and unneeded map. A navbox for the NRL expansion exists and is easier to navigate through than this map. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:55, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NRHP in Glen Canyon NRA edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:16, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and only three links. Not enough for a navbox. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:51, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rahm Emanuel series edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:16, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and very few links to articles relating to Emanuel outside his own. The rest are links to article sections from his mainspace. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:25, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Nomo Sapiens edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:17, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and don't think this will be used. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:25, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ukraine divisions list edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:17, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 20:23, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Northwest League ballparks edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:17, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and redundant as each ballpark linked is already featured on other and more relevant navboxes. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:06, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NPF Year edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 21:36, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and was probably abandoned with the only edit history being creation. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:02, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - thanks for the reminder. The template has been updated and is in use. The message that it's under consideration for deletion is creating frustrating usability issues for the general public. Next time, you might consider just pinging the creator to ask about status. Could've saved everyone -- including yourself --a lot of time. Hmlarson (talk) 20:33, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If I asked about the status every time for each unused template, which there are thousands of, that would be a bigger waste of time. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:41, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep We can close this as keep. Template's now in use. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:41, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:British Library Floor 1 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:18, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Maybe should be substituted. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:53, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as unused. Maybe should be substituted is meaningless since, if it is unused, there are no pages to substitute it on. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:14, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete both per nom. Cavalryman (talk) 04:01, 11 November 2021 (UTC).[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:British Columbia regional districts provincial parks map edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:18, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused map. Better to navigate with Template:British Columbia parks. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:49, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Burnie City LGA InteractiveMap edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:19, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused maps of Tasmania. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:49, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Other MeSH codes edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:19, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:14, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Both unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:40, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • No objection to deletion, though I seem to recall this having a variety of transclusions not long after I made it. Was it intentionally replaced with something? I'd retroactively object to it being made unused if it's been replaced with something inferior. {{Nihiltres |talk |edits}} 20:17, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    It looks like it was reworded to be part of the article rather than a hatnote in edits like Special:Diff/939436994. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:25, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete both per nom. Cavalryman (talk) 04:01, 11 November 2021 (UTC).[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:JFK Airport domestic destinations edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move to userspace. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:21, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and unnecessary as the map links to other airports across the U.S. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:29, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep (or at least userfy), I don't see the issue here. Domestic means within the same country, so linking to other airports around the U.S. is fine. – Epicgenius (talk) 14:04, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. If the decision is not to keep, it should be merged into the JFK Airport as article and redirected, rather than delete. 203.145.95.210 (talk) 15:21, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The issue here is the template isn't being used anywhere and all the links to other airports carry no useful information. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:17, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unlikely to be used per current airport project practice as the article has the same information in table format. MilborneOne (talk) 13:42, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 17:11, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:JFSouthSydneyRabbitohsLadder edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:08, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Standings already exist on the 2019 Jersey Flegg Cup article in table format. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:32, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 17:11, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Jaguar IRS edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:08, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This template is about a mechanical component used for Jaguar cars. These timeline templates are for specific car brands. Not auto parts. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:41, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 17:11, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Jaipur Metro Green Line Route edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:08, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and unnecessary as the main article already has a route map. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 03:09, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 17:11, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Jeddayel weatherbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:09, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Main article already has a weather box in table format. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 03:25, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 17:10, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Jerusalem Labelled Map edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:09, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused map. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 03:25, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 17:10, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Jin emperors edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy keep per WP:SKCRIT#1, no rationale for deletion presented. (non-admin closure) Elli (talk | contribs) 16:58, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not a template but instead is a set indices page differentiating two different templates. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 03:25, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 17:10, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:JinanM lines edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:09, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and unlikely to be. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 03:25, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 17:09, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:JordanGoldenMedalpromote edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:10, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Should be substituted like other barnstar award templates. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 03:25, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 17:09, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete This is another nonsense nomination {the template is unused, so there are no pages to subst it on, and saying that a template should be substituted is not a reason for deletion), but regardless this doesn't even seem to have been substituted anywhere, so should be deleted for that reason. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:07, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Julian solar cycle edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:10, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. If possible to be used, it should be substituted on a relevant article(s). --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 03:25, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 17:09, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:JJBullet/WikiClockMain edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:21, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused WikiClock template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:21, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 17:08, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:JAH/preload-abbreviation edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 03:14, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused empty subpages. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:12, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy keep, these are core parts of Template:JAH used to create various abbreviation redirects [e.g. [1]]. This nomination is breaking the functionality, and should be speedily closed. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 15:30, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • This should be closed, sooner rather than later. It's pretty disruptive to the redirect creation workflow. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:54, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 17:08, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Izno: why was this relisted? The rationale for deletion is flawed, these templates are routinely used. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 17:35, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Because there has been insufficient discussion. You have presented a reason why the nomination may have been "flawed", but no-one else has discussed or agreed with you. If they are so clearly "flawed", I'm sure someone will be along shortly or another to comment that the nomination was insufficient. Izno (talk) 17:37, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This doesn't need more discussion, this needs closing. The nomination is breaking the functionality (or rather greatly reducing the convenience since any preloaded pages need to be cleaned up before saving) of these templates. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 17:39, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, your opinion was evident before relisting. Izno (talk) 17:44, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Headbomb. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:07, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. These are clearly used by, and linked from, {{JAH}}. The nominating editor has been asked multiple times to do more checking before nominating templates that may be substed or used as part of a tool or script. This may have been an oversight at first, but the right thing to do here would have been to withdraw the nomination and tag the pages appropriately. I have tagged all of these templates with {{transclusionless}}, which is a template that can be used to tag untranscluded template pages that are nevertheless used (not necessarily substed directly), or only used occasionally. That tagging keeps them off of the "unused templates" reports. I have also marked all of the TFD nomination tags with noinclude tags so that they do not interfere with the JAH process. Headbomb, please contact me directly if your JAH process is still broken, and I will work on it with you. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:09, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, that fixed it (save for some whitespace, but I took care of that). Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 18:24, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Then Gummidipoondi to Melpakkam edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:22, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 16:08, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Speedway squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:22, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 16:07, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Geographic Location 2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 November 18. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:22, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PopcornTimeTree edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 November 18. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:22, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Largest cities of Chihuahua edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:23, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

single-use table, should be merged with the article Frietjes (talk) 15:13, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Userbox/Pro-Nuclear edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Speedy deleted as G7 by Materialscientist (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). For future reference, Userboxes go to MfD, not TfD (non-admin closure) * Pppery * it has begun... 18:07, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I made this without being aware of Template:User Nuclear Energy, and this is therefore a duplicate and should be removed. ☢️Plutonical☢️ᵀᵃˡᵏ ᵗᵒ ᵐᵉ 13:47, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Jewish delis edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:48, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox that is much better presented in the extant List of Jewish delis. Ibadibam (talk) 08:00, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

US mil. Support Rides edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:55, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Three navboxes that are unnecessary CFORKs to the widely transcluded Template:WWI US Soft Vehicles, Template:WWII US Soft Vehicles and Template:Post-WWII US Soft Vehicles. They are far too big for easy navigation with ridiculously specific groupings, extraordinary overlap between periods and multiple repeated links to the same articles within the navboxes (for example the first one repeats links to Dodge WC series seven times, whilst latter two both repeat links to M39 series 5-ton 6×6 truck at least six times). Further, List of utility vehicles of the United States Armed Forces, which is linked in all three smaller navboxes, provides all of the information about vehicle model payloads and drive from these navboxes in searchable columns. These navboxes were created during Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 October 3#Template:US military utility vehicles, and are only transcluded on a couple of articles that are not about specific models of vehicles. Cavalryman (talk) 03:30, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:OpTic Chicago roster edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:24, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This template should now be deleted as the team has been merged with Dallas Empire and the template as such has been captured here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:OpTic_Texas_roster Tubby23 talk 01:10, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Navegantes del Magallanes edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:38, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and only two links in the entire navbox. No navigational benefit. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:25, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Northern Midlands LGA InteractiveMap edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:37, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused maps. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:15, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete both per nom. (Although they really shouldn't have been bundled since they have nothing in common with each other) * Pppery * it has begun... 18:07, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_November_10&oldid=1055819040"