Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 May 9

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) --Trialpears (talk) 21:02, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pointless temp which give excuse to block busy phone network's IP range on the ground it's an open proxy. 172.93.9.202 (talk) 21:22, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - this template is not "an excuse" to block a network, it explains why the network is blocked when said blocks are placed. The reason that these blocks have such massive collateral damage is down to how T-Mobile's IPv6 infrastructure works. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 09:45, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Preview warning modules

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Module:If preview. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:54, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Without knowing about the prior TFD, I've merged the functionality of Module:Preview warning to Module:If preview as part of the process of removing hatnote from Common.css (see also prior discussion). (NB the prior discussion was probably closed wrongly as a no-consensus -- I would probably have closed as merge to the module -- but I don't see a need to send it to WP:DRV since it was long enough ago and no one else seems to have had heartburn with the close itself. DRV will take as long to overturn as a TFD anyway.)

I've subsequently integrated the module into a dozen or two modules directly and into > 50 templates by use of the wrapper template {{preview warning}}. My search indicates I've fully replaced it, and Special:Whatlinkshere indicates it's not transcluded outside the article namespace meaningfully any longer. Its remaining transclusions should clear eventually; I've been editing a few highly-transcluded templates recently as part of the effort above.

Separately to Preview warning, Galobtter started a similar effort at Module:Preview warning message but didn't get around to finishing. That is nominated for similar reasons. Izno (talk) 18:35, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Euronext. Izno (talk) 15:59, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Irish Stock Exchange with Template:Euronext.
Now redundant. The name is no longer accurate, and simply using Template:Euronext in place works without any additonal changes. 151.226.40.70 (talk) 18:50, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 18:26, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 15:58, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Meaningless template with no purpose, created by a troll account. Laplorfill (talk) 01:40, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).