Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 March 7

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< March 6 March 8 >

March 7 edit

Template:Colombia riders edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 01:33, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Team is defunct, so the template is no longer required. Craig(talk) 23:49, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - per nom. Current riders for a defunct team. Nigej (talk) 09:08, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Team Virtu Cycling riders edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 01:34, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Team is defunct, so the template is no longer required. Craig(talk) 22:58, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - per nom. Current riders for a defunct team. Nigej (talk) 09:08, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Équipe Paule Ka riders edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 01:35, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Team is defunct, so the template is no longer required. Craig(talk) 21:46, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - per nom. Current riders for a defunct team. Nigej (talk) 09:08, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mate Bulić edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — The Earwig (talk) 00:29, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Navigational template for Mate Bulić; no longer serves a purpose now that the listed albums have been turned into redirects and the 'related articles' listed have no use for this template. Lennart97 (talk) 14:18, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ambiguous episcopal titles and sees in England edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:41, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The template is certainly a good-faith creation, but it is most unusual to have a navigation box for dabs, per MOS:DAB#Images and templates. I'll notify WikiProject Disambiguation. Certes (talk) 11:11, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Extended periodic table (by Pyykkö, 50 columns, periods 8–9) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:46, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No longer used, as instances in Extended periodic table have been replaced by images. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 07:16, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hardcoded edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:43, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:T3 no longer exists as a criteria and this is unused. Elli (talk | contribs) 06:25, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:LibyaUsers edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:44, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No reason to have this be a template; no uses; same list exists at Wikipedia:WikiProject Libya/participants. Elli (talk | contribs) 05:55, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lht edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 March 19. Primefac (talk) 13:29, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Life:) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:44, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navigation template; redundant to Template:Turkcell Group. Elli (talk | contribs) 05:51, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lightning edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Note that Template:Meetupsig/intro is used over 1700 times so would need further discussion before deleting. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:55, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Only used in one Wikipedia-meetup page from 2017 - hasn't found widespread use. Suggest to subst and delete for historical reasons. Elli (talk | contribs) 05:42, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:M class minelayer edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:56, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navigation template where the main article and all the sub-articles redlink. Elli (talk | contribs) 05:39, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox unhexquadium edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 03:34, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused infobox for an element (164) that's so far from what's known (118) that it's not particularly likely it'll become notable anytime soon, not to mention that all the data is hence quite speculative. Double sharp (talk) 03:30, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete clearly, unhexquadium is not an article (and when it is, this infobox could be refunded). Elli (talk | contribs) 04:44, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. We are very restricive with speculative elements. -DePiep (talk) 11:48, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, unfinished infobox for an element that has yet to be discovered. Prospects of notability are reasonable, as evidenced by detailed predictions of its chemistry and stability, but no article exists yet. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:32, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom (speculation and no corresponding article), but recreate if and when an article is written about this element. ComplexRational (talk) 20:43, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I note that there are no other templates for systematic names above 128. YBG (talk) 01:40, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Leng Tch'e edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 02:58, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation template for band no longer serves a purpose as all listed albums redirect to the band itself. Lennart97 (talk) 00:36, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_March_7&oldid=1012998701"