Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 March 5

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< March 4 March 6 >

March 5 edit

BWF Indian Top 10 Singles Ranking edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:06, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

They appear in Badminton in India#Current ranking but are not current, with hardly any updates since 2017. There are new rankings each week, although there was a long hiatus due to Covid-19. Best deleted since there is no indication that they will be kept up-to-date. Nigej (talk) 20:18, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as single-use. Whether to subst the content first is not a matter for TfD, but I do agree that having these templates is a bad idea if no one is willing to update them. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:12, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Trimurti Films edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 March 13. (non-admin closure) EN-Jungwon 06:07, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hmmm edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Qmark. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 02:52, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Hmmm with Template:Qmark.
These templates are very similar. I'm not sure the difference in the alt text warrants the distinction. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 18:11, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support per nom. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 18:55, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. Qmark seems the better name. Nigej (talk) 19:44, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge not meaningfully different. No opinion on which name is better. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:12, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. I also agree that Qmark seems the better name. Impru20talk 10:57, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • If {{hmmm}} weren't used on several thousand pages, I'd have suggested changing it to display "🤔". – Uanfala (talk) 01:47, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Latest preview software release/DOSBox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:19, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DOSBox has no preview releases; SVN revision number is not a release! One can easily browse through other articles using this template (Special:PrefixIndex/Template:Latest_preview_software_release) to see that normally, preview releases have proper version numbers, announcements, etc. In here refs are pointing to 3rd-party, unofficial, outdated builds. SVN revision will be increased automatically with every new commit, so information about this fake "preview release" is always outdated. Dreamer_ (talk) 16:12, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Template:Latest preview software release/* is a total misuse of template namespace anyway, as each template is only used on one page. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:12, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Old RfA vote templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) EN-Jungwon 08:26, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to {{Rfan}}, which from what I can tell is what is actually used (these are linked hardly anywhere). Elli (talk | contribs) 06:41, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Math2english edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) EN-Jungwon 08:23, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused cleanup template; not included in clean-up project template indexes (incoming links are either discussions/lists from 2009/10 or lists of unused templates). Too specific to be often useful. Elli (talk | contribs) 06:31, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Master Editor IV v2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) EN-Jungwon 08:23, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused duplicate of {{Master Editor IV}}; same results can be accomplished with {{Master Editor IV|align=center}}. Elli (talk | contribs) 06:25, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_March_5&oldid=1138372515"