Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 January 6

Planetary system navboxes with one star and one planet

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 11:29, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Useless navboxes linking to only two articles. SevenSpheresCelestia (talk) 20:57, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: I see that Template:Kepler-4 has also been previously deleted for the same reason. SevenSpheresCelestia (talk) 21:20, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn. Nomiator has withdrawn this nomination, and no one else has voted delete. (non-admin closure) Techie3 (talk) 03:37, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Should be deleted. Template purely provides an external link to an article specific page on Weibo. Weibo requires registration to view any content. As a result this fails WP:ELNO #6 and it is not of use for the majority of readers. Canterbury Tail talk 17:50, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:40, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete and unused; replaced by {{Railway-routemap}}. AlgaeGraphix (talk) 17:49, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 January 17. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 11:28, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:34, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicates Template:Column-generating template families without the helpful hints regarding usability, mobile-friendliness, and related templates. Maybe the one thing I'd add to column-generating is the link to WP:ACCESS, but that's it (and it needs to be contextualized). Izno (talk) 02:17, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was "Soft redirect". to Template:Puerto Rico Governors. Allow anyone to revert if they object. While it would have been nice if it the TfD notices were placed properly this proposal seems unlikely to be controversial and no one has objected to the proposal making relisting or starting a new nomination overly bureaucratic. If there are any objections a new discussion can be started then. (non-admin closure) --Trialpears (talk) 08:45, 18 January 2021 (UTC) Template:Puerto Rico Governors (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) Identical info in the former, is in the latter. GoodDay (talk) 01:49, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ProcrastinatingReader: If you wish. I'm never any good at how to do these things. The instructions are way too confusing for me. One of those template must be deleted. GoodDay (talk) 12:13, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).