Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 January 25
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Techie3 (talk) 10:23, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Template is copied into Template:Notre Dame Fighting Irish captains navbox that has the better title. So this template is superfluous. The Banner talk 18:25, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete both this template and Template:Notre Dame Fighting Irish captains navbox per WP:NAVBOX #4. Pretty bad case of WP:NAVBOXCREEP. Best, GPL93 (talk) 02:21, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete same reason of GPL93.--Ḥdiddān 09:12, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Nigej (talk) 15:27, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per GPL93. Orientls (talk) 07:49, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 13:47, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Consists entirely of redlinks. Poydoo can talk and edit 15:31, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Create some content first, then create the navbox. Nigej (talk) 15:24, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Template:Permastub (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
In my opinion, this template should be deleted because what do you want to inform with a sentence "however there are not enough verifiable sources on it, or it is a finished article." for an article indicated as a stub, where a stub means an obviously short but usable article? There may be very short and at the same time comprehensive article, but let's not confuse "you can't expand it" with "I don't know how to expand it". In addition, the template is unused--Ḥdiddān 16:08, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
- Comment:Relocating deletion request from AfD to TfD ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 01:10, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as unused. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:12, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 February 5. Primefac (talk) 01:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- Template:Number_format (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Module:Number_format (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).