Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 January 20

January 20 edit

Template:Ingrid Andress edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 17:49, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Contains a total of 3 articles, each of which link to the other 2 without the aid of this navigational box. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 19:32, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - So little to actually navigate. -- Whpq (talk) 19:38, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not enough links to justify its existence. Nigej (talk) 20:19, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:TOOSOON. She's only on her second single. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 04:25, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Inside infobox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:03, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and obsolete. AlgaeGraphix (talk) 18:23, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Unused and seemingly pointless. Nigej (talk) 20:21, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @Nigej: There was a time when Route Diagram Templates needed to be hardcoded to display properly inside infoboxes, hence the note to editors to be aware of the extra code. Since then RDT templates have been improved and it's now just a matter of a parameter setting. AlgaeGraphix (talk) 20:43, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:StringFunc edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:03, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused (merged into Module:String2), though Special:WhatLinksHere hasn't updated yet. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 02:13, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).