Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 December 23

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< December 22 December 24 >

December 23 edit

Template:Flag data Isaaq Sultanate edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Country data Isaaq Sultanate. There appears to be confusion over the difference between Template:Flag data Isaaq Sultanate and Template:Country data Isaaq Sultanate. Given that so many of the Flag data templates are redirects to the corresponding Country data templates, it seems this one should be redirected as well. Or, if someone wants to resolve this duplication another way, let me know. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:02, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused flag data template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:25, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep flag data template for a country that existed, thus usable in the future, and part of a system of flag data templates for all countries, thus expected to exist. -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 22:42, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Doesn't matter if it existed. That has very little relevance. There isn't a need for former countries such as this to have a flag data template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:13, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as unused. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:23, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Just added the flag data template to the British attack on Berbera (1827) article and I'll be adding it to more articles in the future. Dabaqabad (talk) 19:42, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @Dabaqabad pretty strange, while I see your edit the template still has no transclusions. Gonnym (talk) 16:34, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 23:24, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: Now used; almost all flag data/country data templates can/will have some instance of use. Curbon7 (talk) 04:37, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SAARC2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:55, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Used once at SAARC Chamber of Commerce and Industry and redundant to Template:South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation. Gonnym (talk) 22:54, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:South Carolina weatherbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete per this discussion and prior discussions Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:04, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

unused duplicates of tables already in the parent article Frietjes (talk) 17:43, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:LayoutTemplateArgs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:51, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no incoming links, no documentation. Only substantive edit was creation in 2010. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:48, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no substantial content, unclear purpose. User:GKFXtalk 16:50, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Manila Rail Transit color edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:21, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

replaced by {{adjacent stations}} system Frietjes (talk) 16:48, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 21:50, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:List of metropolitan areas by population, Forstall edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:42, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Only one incoming link, from Talk:World's largest municipalities by population, where it is discussed as being unusable there. The corresponding article, List of largest cities, has an extensive table that is better than anything this template can provide. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Luding Autor edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:42, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no documentation, no incoming links. No substantive edits since creation in early 2019. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:40, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:0expr edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:50, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Broadly equivalent to {{padleft:{{#expr:content}}|2}}; redundant to whichever of the functions padleft or expr were required. Refactored out of a couple of templates in favour of padleft and now near-unused. User:GKFXtalk 16:24, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Early Brahmic scripts edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 20:28, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A single-use template after I removed its transclusions on four articles as it was improperly being used as a citation. It's only usage is a proper form and should be substituted on the Brahmic scripts articles. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:55, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:28, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 16:02, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ME-ref/FAIL edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:21, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no, the template is no longer in use. Q28 (talk) 14:15, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. No longer used. Nigej (talk) 16:15, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. This template is used by {{ME-source}}. You can see it in use if you erroneously leave out the book name, like this: {{ME-ref||section}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:22, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Some documentation would be useful. Nigej (talk) 18:43, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Jonesey95. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:13, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Rugby Union biography/testcases edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:20, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

now useless and unused. The main page is now a redirect. Magioladitis (talk) 12:50, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:G8 also works here. Gonnym (talk) 21:49, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Template:Infobox rugby biography/testcases. There's no good reason to delete this (instead of redirecting), and the G8 criterion does not apply since G8 only applies to Pages dependent on a non-existent or deleted page, and redirects are not non-existent or deleted page[s] * Pppery * it has begun... 01:13, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
We'll have to disagree with that interpretation. Gonnym (talk) 12:15, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Circle edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:25, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This circle image is missued as a note by using the |alt= text of an image. These should be replaced with {{efn}} or other note type templates. Gonnym (talk) 12:14, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • The template doesn't have an alt parameter – can you explain what you're referring to? Having said that, I have no recollection of why I created this template 10 years ago, and I wouldn't be upset if it were deleted. This, that and the other (talk) 12:29, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I was looking at the usages here but you are right the template itself did not have an |alt=, not sure how I missed that. That does however make their usage there even stranger. Gonnym (talk) 21:43, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Fix misuse of the template, Keep as useful, and provide documentation about its proper use. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:30, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I have removed the misuse of the template. There is now just one usage remaining, at Wikipedia talk:Twinkle/Archive 25, which would be better served by {{Radio button|off}} →  . User:GKFXtalk 17:09, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per GKFX. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:13, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Beta letter edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:15, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. The doc does say it can be transcluded or substituted, however, it's a simple character so there really isn't any more need for it to have a template than for any other non-Latin character. Gonnym (talk) 12:11, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. All characters should be written either directly or as an HTML entity if required (e.g. &nbsp;); no need for templates that do this too. If someone is struggling to type β then writing &beta; or copy-pasting from Beta are both very feasible. User:GKFXtalk 16:34, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete this isn't even all beta, it's just &beta; (β) and not &Beta; (Β) -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 03:04, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Alt edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:15, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. Gonnym (talk) 12:08, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

oh, that's a shame, I happen to like that template. That seems pretty useful. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 12:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. @Theleekycauldron: You can use HTML entities to do the same sort of thing without a template. Alt codes are Windows-specific and based on various obsolete code pages. HTML entities always use Unicode which is universally available. From the documentation, {{alt|171}} = ½, and the equivalent HTML is &#189; = ½. User:GKFXtalk 16:44, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Space/Articles edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:46, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These templates are not used.`^ Q28 (talk) 11:46, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Translation/One-liner edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:43, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like the template is no longer in use. Maybe we should delete it. Q28 (talk) 11:43, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Translation/Preload edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 30. ✗plicit 12:19, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Seggol edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:43, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the template is not used.$- Q28 (talk) 11:41, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. All other related Hebrew templates were deleted. Gonnym (talk) 21:49, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No contest. - Gilgamesh (talk) 23:24, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox musician awards/new edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:40, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The template has not been used since 2019. Q28 (talk) 11:39, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Miss Chile winners in the Big Four pageants edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 20:27, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NENAN. Just two relevant links The Banner talk 22:10, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Not enough links. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:21, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rewrite and rename rewrite as a general Miss Chile template, and rename to {{Miss Chile}}, to navigate between pageants and winners -- 65.92.246.43 (talk) 04:03, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 01:36, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 07:33, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Not enough links....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:43, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The reality is that this whole series should be deleted. There is no article Miss Chile winners in the Big Four pageants so fails WP:NAVBOX #4. Also, there's no other connection between them than the obvious: they were the two Miss Chile winners in the Big Four pageants. Basically its being used in 2 articles, as a decorative banner. Useless for navigation. Nigej (talk) 11:49, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Miss Canada winners in the Big Four pageants edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 20:27, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NENAN Just three relevant links The Banner talk 22:09, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Not enough links. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:21, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rewrite and rename rewrite as a general Miss Canada template, and rename to {{Miss Canada}}, to navigate between pageants and winners -- 65.92.246.43 (talk) 04:03, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 01:36, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 07:33, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Not useful for navigation. Nigej (talk) 11:50, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not enough links....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:03, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Styles/styles.css edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:39, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This CSS page is not used as far as I know. Q28 (talk) 05:51, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. User:GKFXtalk 17:15, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Syntaxhighlight/styles.css edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:39, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused CSS.!' Q28 (talk) 05:51, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. User:GKFXtalk 17:14, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:TAFI/Blurb/static edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:38, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The template is no longer in use~- Q28 (talk) 05:49, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Did you know/Time edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 05:49, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The template is no longer used after a DYK template change. Q28 (talk) 05:40, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Uruguayan referendums, 2009 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:55, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as 2009 Uruguayan referendum uses a different table. Gonnym (talk) 02:17, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Party shading/Atassut edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:58, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Greenland political party shading templates. Gonnym (talk) 02:12, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Italian institutional referendum, 1946 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:53, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as 1946 Italian institutional referendum uses different tables and images. Gonnym (talk) 01:51, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Unused duplicate. Nigej (talk) 12:53, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ConstituencyChanges2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:12, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Near-identical to Template:Constituency changes and used on just one article. No reason given for the difference between this and the original template, it just swaps the order of two columns. Should be replaced with the original template. User:GKFXtalk 00:10, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Replace/delete per nom. Better to stick to a uniform style, surely. Nigej (talk) 12:55, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_December_23&oldid=1062845162"