Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 August 23

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< August 22 August 24 >

August 23 edit

Template:Fixcaps edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 August 31. ✗plicit 13:46, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Countries at major beauty pageants edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:17, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/France at major beauty pageants, this template almost contains no bluelinks anymore and serves no purpose. Geschichte (talk) 22:36, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Johor state election, 1986 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:47, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged (with attribution) with 1986 Malaysian state elections Frietjes (talk) 19:37, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rhineland-Palatinate state election, 1991 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:46, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

unused, duplicate of tables in 1991 Rhineland-Palatinate state election, 1996 Rhineland-Palatinate state election, 2011 Rhineland-Palatinate state election Frietjes (talk) 17:34, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Audio sample and Template:External music video edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Primefac (talk) 00:19, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Strong merge (External music video) and less certain merge (Audio sample) to Template:Infobox song. I believe the extra templates were created so that they could both be used in Template:Infobox song and Template:Infobox single. However, the single infobox was merged into the song infobox a couple years back, so there's no reason why these other templates must exist. They can easily be simplified into Infobox song as |sample=, |video=, and |video_header= (most of the other parameters in the extra templates, like "description", are never used, while others, like "type", would be redundant after merging).

I'm less certain about Audio sample because I haven't checked to see if it's used on other infobox templates. However, according to the documentation for External music video, that one was definitely created to be used exclusively by Infobox song. ili (talk) 17:05, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep; withdraw and think about it some more. Faulty logic that could have been disproved with a bit of research, which I will teach you how to do here. Audio sample is used in various different infoboxes at Piano Concerto No. 1 (Tchaikovsky) and Ionisation (Varèse) and Replicas (album). These were not hard to find by searching for "album" in "What links here", or by looking through for other likely non-songs. Another method is using Petscan to find the 558 articles that appear to contain Audio sample but not Infobox song. Similarly, here are 488 articles that contain External music video but not Infobox song, as far as I can tell. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:59, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the info. I see that Audio sample has other valid functions, but for those articles linked for External music video, they seem to indicate that exceptions amount to sloppy urls to individual tracks placed in album infoboxes. ili (talk) 19:07, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Links to external music videos should be included in an article section where the videos are discussed. Otherwise, they should be located in the External links section. —Ojorojo (talk) 13:31, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ojorojo: Then shouldn't you be voting for "Delete"? If you simply oppose to a merge, that means we're still stuck with the extra template. ili (talk) 17:09, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That's beyond the scope of this tfd and would also necessitate a bot to reformat the existing links to move to them to External links. One step at a time. —Ojorojo (talk) 18:00, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FC Smolevichi squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:05, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Squad navbox for a football club that relegated to amateur level. Will be 95% redlinked for foreseeable future. BlameRuiner (talk) 07:49, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 10:54, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Use Australian English/sandbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 August 31. ✗plicit 00:48, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Syed Anayat Shah-MNA-stub edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:34, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not a stub template, and not even a template. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:48, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2022 FIVB Volleyball Men's World Championship qualified teams edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:10, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused; Content merged into 2022 FIVB Volleyball Men's World Championship qualification and section transclusion for 2022 FIVB Volleyball Men's World Championship. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:28, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Moheener Ghoraguli edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:10, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Originally nominated for speedy deletion by @UnitedStatesian with the reason "WP:WikiProject Moheener Ghoraguli has never existed; looks like created as a test." FASTILY 02:55, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Shirley Jackson edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:09, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unused template for project that existed for five days four years ago, before being merged out of existence. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:48, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sikkim Legislative Assembly election, 2014 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 15:37, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Very much like the past India election templates I've nominated in the past. Should be substituted where used. Templates are not a good place to have election results. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:42, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete to 2014 Sikkim Legislative Assembly election and section transclude to 2014 elections in India. Gonnym (talk) 08:46, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hong Kong Chief Executive election, 2007 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:09, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All unused and redundant as the three election articles use different tables for the results. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:32, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unused. Gonnym (talk) 08:26, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hong Kong district boards election, 1985 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:38, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All single-use and should be substituted on the respective election articles. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:29, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete to election article per nom. Gonnym (talk) 08:25, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hong Kong legislative election, 1991 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:34, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All single-use and should be substituted on the respective election articles. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:18, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete to election article per nom. Gonnym (talk) 08:25, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hong Kong urban council and regional council elections, 1986 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:15, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All single-use and should be substituted on the respective election articles. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:13, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete to election article per nom. Gonnym (talk) 08:24, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_August_23&oldid=1042433920"