Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 August 10

< August 9	August 11 >

August 10 edit

Template:Landrat of Uri election, 2012 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:36, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Landrat of Uri election, 2012 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Landrat of Uri election, 2016 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Landrat of Uri election, 2020 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All should be substituted where used as there is no election mainspace for them. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:54, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete. Subst to Landrat of Uri as no election article exists. Gonnym (talk) 12:50, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PS2056-Taplejung-2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:54, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PS2056-Taplejung-2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Same as the August 2 templates nominated as it is pointless for it's intended purpose. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:11, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 12:45, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sub judice and Contempt Hong Kong edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:28, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sub judice and Contempt Hong Kong (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template. Duplicates and can be replaced by Template:Sub judice. Celia Homeford (talk) 14:45, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:40, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Uw-voteremoved edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:51, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Uw-voteremoved (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

There is no consensus to allow editors to remove or strike !votes at deletion discussions based solely on the rationale that they have WP:NOREASON. A template that warns editors that their !votes have been removed due to a lack of reasoning is therefore of questionable use. This template also appears to have never been used, with the phrase "Please note that deletion debates are consensus-based discussions, not ballot polls," only turning up two results, this template and User:Passengerpigeon/sandbox where the template was tested. Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 04:37, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:40, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as contrary to policy. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:25, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sura-svg edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:50, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sura-svg (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template's intended use is specifically in {{Infobox surah}}, but then it should be hardcoded in there, rather than as a separate template. However, its purpose seems to be merely adding another Arabic rendition (external, of unknown copyright status?) in addition to the extant |name-ar parameter. Thus I'd rather see this template deleted than merged. HyperGaruda (talk) 04:19, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:40, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).