Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 September 8

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< September 7 September 9 >

September 8 edit

Template:Skarloey Railway RDT edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Keep for now. Delete in one month if still unused. I've added it to the holding cell to make sure it doesn't get missed and dropped a note at Talk:Sodor (fictional island). (non-admin closure) --Trialpears (talk) 20:41, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article this was designed to accompany was recently redirected at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skarloey Railway, and this template is currently unused and doesn't seem particularly useful anywhere else. The fact that this route diagram only has one functioning link it appears doesn't scream "useful template" either. Hog Farm Bacon 21:05, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose: I do believe it could be added to Sodor (fictional island). That page needs a lot of work after the recent deletions regarding the Railway Series so I would hold off on deleting just for now. Maybe wait a month or two and if it's not used then delete it. Either that or turn it into an image if it's not already. Why? I Ask (talk) 01:52, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Per Why? I Ask, conditional delete. Place the template in holding cell for a month and delete if still not used then. No point in keeping stuff around that "might" be used sometime in an unknown future date. --Gonnym (talk) 10:30, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Spümcø edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 September 20. Primefac (talk) 14:02, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Notsockdyn edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 01:08, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I created this template early last year, but nobody wanted it and it never got used. —DoRD (talk)​ 18:10, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per author request. --Gonnym (talk) 10:28, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ME-tasks edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Techie3 (talk) 08:31, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This seems way past its sell-by date. The project is basically not using it, as co-ordination happens on talk pages. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:08, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Chiswick Chap is an active member of ME related articles, so if they say it isn't being used, it probably isn't. --Gonnym (talk) 10:23, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ME-taskbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. No prejudice against recreation of someone finds a good use for it. Primefac (talk) 15:14, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This seems quite useless and long past its sell-by date. It may once have had some kind of function among project users but it doesn't seem to have done anything since 2007. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:06, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Chiswick Chap is an active member of ME related articles, so if they say it isn't being used, it probably isn't. --Gonnym (talk) 10:23, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Extended techniques edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 September 20. Primefac (talk) 14:00, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Third Strike (album) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 15:03, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant navigation to {{Tinchy Stryder}}. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 04:34, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as duplicates a sub-set of that data. --Gonnym (talk) 10:23, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Is This the Life We Really Want? edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Techie3 (talk) 15:23, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For an album navigational box, there is little to navigate to here, and what there is (except for the link to Mahmoud Darwish) can be found in the comprehensive {{Roger Waters}} navbox. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 04:00, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. All links are found in the main Roger Waters template. Mahmoud Darwish doesn't even use this template. --Gonnym (talk) 10:26, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Kamikaze (Eminem album) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. No prejudice against recreation and/or REFUND if the main template is split. Primefac (talk) 14:52, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All tracks that have articles are already linked in the comprehensive {{Eminem songs}} navbox, which is grouped by album. That navbox also links to "Killshot" in its other singles group. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 03:46, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars, It doesn't include the Machine Gun Kelly song and this navbox is getting pretty long, so it may need to be broken up anyway. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:40, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I would think if it were to be broken up, it would be a split by something like pre-2010 and since 2010 rather than a navbox for every album, like {{George Strait 1980s singles}} or {{Reba McEntire 1990s singles}}. I certainly would be more interested in navigating quickly to other songs beyond just what's on this one album. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 16:36, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete if the Eminem template is kept as is (which includes the Kamikaze album). Keep if the Eminem template is split into albums. --Gonnym (talk) 10:27, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2020_September_8&oldid=979404939"