Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 September 23

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< September 22 September 24 >

September 23 edit

Template:R from historic name edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 October 5. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 23:34, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Carleton S. Coon Racial Definitions edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 21:27, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, an apparent very old user experiment. The maps linked are original research, as on inspection they are not faithful reproductions from Coon's publications. The template is problematic due to the contentious subject matter (science no longer recognizes these human race theories), which itself can be considered part of Arbcom's race and intelligence discretionary sanctions. So it's a bit of a bear trap waiting to be set off, frankly. Fæ (talk) 16:06, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Finnish municipality edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:39, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Replace (subst:) with Infobox settlement and delete

"Finnish municipality"-specific wrapper for {{Infobox settlement}}. Subst:itution will reduce the maintenance overhead, reduce the cognitive burden for editors, and enable articles to benefit more immediately from improvements to the current parent template. TfD outcome 2 March 2020 was delete [1], 22 March 2020 it was in DRV [2] Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2019 March 22. The relist was done, Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 April 6#Template:Infobox Finnish municipality, had a dubious closing "no consensus" despite that the votes before relist were:

  • Subst and delete
  • Delete after replacement
  • Keep until replacement
  • SPEEDY CLOSE ("is a wrapper since creation" and the IP proposed it itself for substitution)

There was another Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2019 June 9, which was closed with This means that the "no consensus" closure of the TfD is maintained by default. I'm not giving much weight to the opinion by the IP with an edit-count of one. In that DRV a user said Today I separated all data from the infobox, the replacement could now be done similar to how data is handled for the municipalities in the Netherlands. It was also said The vote was clear, only one opposer, still you decided to call it "no consensus". . But the one person closing as "no consensus" again supported his view stating I think it would be more productive to spend 7 days on a new Tfd (as I mentioned you could do so on my talk page), likely getting a consensus for subst and delete, rather than spending 7 days at DRV

But it seems people got tired by the closures and relists and no one started a new TfD, despite the actual template code now being much better suited to substitution than it was after the initial outcome "delete". 77.183.162.229 (talk) 16:00, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Archive index edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 October 4. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 15:24, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Not a reference desk edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 15:28, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template used on 15 pages that largely duplicates the very first thing on every talk pages it's used on: "This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ARTICLENAME article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject." --Trialpears (talk) 12:53, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No real complaints (as the author), though I imagine (thinking back twelve years) that the original impetus was because people were using talk pages as helpdesks despite {{talkheader}}'s admonitions even back then. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 12:56, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:KK Bosna current roster edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:31, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The template is unused and there has no updates since April 2019. --DragonFederal (talk) 08:29, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK delete the template if you must, or maybe i will update them. Bosna Sarajevo (talk) 15:26, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:User is blocked edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 October 4. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 15:26, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:User talk-page header edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 October 4. Primefac (talk) 16:56, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Sydney Ferries templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 15:32, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deprecated {{s-line}} templates replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Ferries in NSW. Fleet Lists (talk) 02:02, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support per nom. BLAIXX 02:09, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2020_September_23&oldid=982371413"