Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 May 13

May 13 edit

Template:98thPercentile website edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. It was indeed nothing more than advertising, and it has been G11'd. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! 01:31, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is nothing more than an advertisement Bill Cherowitzo (talk) 19:50, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Acharnai Railway Center edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:41, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant abandoned infobox, used only on one article whose title does not match the infobox and which already uses the standard {{infobox station}}. Guy (help!) 08:03, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom.--Tom (LT) (talk) 05:55, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, content is unsuitable for an infobox. The routemap could be ported to the other infobox on the article if it is deemed useful. BLAIXX 14:40, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, use {{infobox station}} per nom. PPEMES (talk) 14:29, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Cricket templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:41, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These templates have been merged into the parent article HawkAussie (talk) 02:21, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).