Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 May 11

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< May 10 May 12 >

May 11 edit

Module:Sitelinks edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 22:42, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, unclear purpose. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:54, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheTVExpert (talk) 22:38, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tbbt edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:23, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Only used on one article. TheTVExpert (talk) 22:35, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CAHL seasons edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 19:50, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox with zero bluelinks. BLAIXX 18:30, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Andriy Slyusarchuk/n edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 18:25, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and strange. No links, no transclusions after ten years. Subtemplate with no parent template. It was transcluded once at a related article talk page, but I substed it because there was no reason for that talk page content to live in Template space. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:17, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bengali Wikisource edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 13:41, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We should almost never be directing readers to pages in a language most readers don't understand and when necessary it can be done using {{Wikisource}} by including the language prefix (which is also required when using this template). The language of the work should be obvious from the article making it non essential to specify. Also worth noting that we don't have templates like this for any other languages and that it only has 1 transclusion for which a page is available at English Wikisource. ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 21:36, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheTVExpert (talk) 12:05, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:RMNote edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:RM notification. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 20:00, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:RMNote with Template:RM notification.
These templates should probably be merged. There has been somewhat of a movement lately to get these discussion notification templates all centralized into one notification template per each forum. Take these two for example: The interested parties could be notified right away, rather than when the discussion is relisted. Steel1943 (talk) 21:21, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, pinging Wbm1058 since I know a bot they manage, RMCD bot, uses some sort of similar makeshift template when notifies talk pages of pages that are proposed to be moved as part of a multi move when they are not the primary page listed. (I cannot determine what specific page is used for this notification, but every time this notification is posted, a transclusion of User:RMCD bot/multimove is also there.) Steel1943 (talk) 21:24, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheTVExpert (talk) 12:05, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge. Oh gosh yes, this is obvious. Thank you, Steel1943. --Bsherr (talk) 12:49, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wikispore edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 May 18. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 17:00, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rhûn edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:26, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's not being used and probably never will be. TheImaCow (talk) 08:49, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Fancruft, misuse of template space, probable test page. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 14:05, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:05, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I concur, looks like a dubious page. --Bsherr (talk) 03:40, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Movies.com edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:26, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's not being used anywhere, I think it can go. TheImaCow (talk) 08:45, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Hmm, it's broken, to the extent I can tell, in that movies.go.com, which it links to, redirects to disney.com now. There is a movies.com, but without an example link in this format, I don't know if they still work by forwarding. --Bsherr (talk) 17:43, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:05, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:S-line/Korail left/Gwangju-Songjeong Mugunghwa edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 17:01, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Originally nominated for speedy deletion by @AJP426 with the reason "unused after replaced with Template:S-line/Korail left/Mugunghwa-ho" FASTILY 01:00, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2020_May_11&oldid=957464533"