Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 June 5

< June 4	June 6 >

June 5 edit

Template:Ukrainian crisis navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:07, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ukrainian crisis navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template is split to four templates, see discussion page. Now it is redundant. Zotur (talk) 19:56, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete per nom. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 23:13, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox soap opera family edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox fictional family. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:26, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox soap opera family (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox fictional family (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Infobox soap opera family with Template:Infobox fictional family, because both are infoboxes for a fictional family and per WP:INFOCOL. TheTVExpert (talk) 15:02, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: the soap opera template has a sub-template, {{Infobox soap opera family/member}}. You can see how that works in Ferreira family. That sub-template is used where individual characters no not have their own articles or list entries and therefore do not have their own infobox, so it gives additional information specific to individual members of the family. I wouldn't be opposed to a merge if that could be merged as well as any other extra fields. — 🌼📽️Anemone Projectors💬 16:02, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The sub-template is only used in one mainspace article. TheTVExpert (talk) 14:55, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK with a Merge, though I should note that {{Infobox soap opera family}} has 40 transclusions from actual articles whereas {{Infobox fictional family}} has only 9. Parameters like |portrayer=, |spinoffs=, and the functionality of {{Infobox soap opera family/member}} need to be integrated into the consolidated template. It may be easier to rename {{Infobox soap opera family}} as {{Infobox fictional family}} and add the |first_major= and |first_minor= functionality as alternates to |first= (though I was a little confused by those parameter names until I realized they were for series/episode etc.)— TAnthony^Talk 17:16, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per INFOCOL. This is a logical merge. --Tom (LT) (talk) 00:28, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Same scope. --Gonnym (talk) 20:12, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Subdash edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:05, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Subdash (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only used in one userspace page, redundant to the actual character and {{En dash}} ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:38, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Replace/subst and delete. Used once. Second best option would be to userify. --Tom (LT) (talk) 00:28, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not so significant. Orientls (talk) 07:17, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Replace and delete. Not needed. --Gonnym (talk) 20:15, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).