Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 June 27

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< June 26 June 28 >

June 27 edit

Template:Washington Huskies men's soccer squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 July 5. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 03:53, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Indianrailwayzones-numbered edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 July 5. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 03:54, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cold Squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Plastikspork (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:08, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Only contains two articles that already link to each other. TheTVExpert (talk) 21:56, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK to delete. When I created the template I was also ready to create two other pages related to the series, but unexpected things came up and the time and focus I'd planned had to take a backseat. Pyxis Solitary (yak). L not Q. 03:43, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SWLtest edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 02:44, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Currently unused, seems not very useful (anymore). TheImaCow (talk) 19:17, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

SSN roster edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 02:44, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Currently unused, they seem not very useful (anymore). TheImaCow (talk) 18:53, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SSBC edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 01:36, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused nabox; contains only one link. TheImaCow (talk) 18:51, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. No need for a navbox here; can be recreated when there are more links.--Tom (LT) (talk) 06:06, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SDIO timeline edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 July 5. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 03:54, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:OlympicEventDetails edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 01:42, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Never-used, unnecessary template using collapsing functionality. Izno (talk) 18:48, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:GeorgiaPhysiology edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 01:33, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is an external link template that has been useless for quite some time since the website it was linking to is dead. Now it doesn't even create a link anymore, just an unhelpful and incomplete reference to an inaccessible source. bender235 (talk) 15:05, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Is a dead link. Illustrates why these templates to simplify some external links are useful though; we can address this issue in one fell swoop. --Tom (LT) (talk) 08:22, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:46, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment, I updated it to use web.archive.org links. Tom (LT) and bender235, is that better or should it still be deleted? It looks like it's being used as a citation in many cases. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:43, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I thought about fixing it with the Wayback Machine, too, but I didn't think it would be working with a flexible URL (given that the template allows for individual chapters to be referred to). Does it? --bender235 (talk) 20:12, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Plastikspork thanks for that, does it work at your end? When I click the links I can't actually access the websites via Wayback machine at the moment though. I'm definitely bordering on 'keep' if this is the case.--Tom (LT) (talk) 05:59, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      • Tom (LT) and bender235, it's likely that didn't fix all of them, but it did work for the ones that I tried. In my experience, wayback machine will auto-correct archive dates if they aren't exactly right (using a neighboring date). The best thing to do is probably just substitute/delete, and then correct the wayback links if they aren't working. What do you think? Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:20, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It's probably the best solution for now, but in the medium and long run we should probably try to phase out this template. --bender235 (talk) 16:24, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • substitute and delete, there shouldn't be any new uses and we can easily check and fix any existing ones after this is substituted. just make sure to keep a list of all the places where it is substituted, and I will check them. Frietjes (talk) 18:32, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sigpollshow edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 02:45, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Used only 5 times and really doesn't need a whole separate template. Izno (talk) 18:44, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hider edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 02:44, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This template duplicates {{collapse}} in functionality. I've already removed its mainspace uses per WP:MOSCOLLAPSE. Izno (talk) 18:39, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. For the sake of simplicity, these sort of things need just one way to do them, and this is not widely used.--Tom (LT) (talk) 06:06, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SPIpuppetsof edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 July 5. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 03:53, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SPIusernotice edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 July 5. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 03:52, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SOWL-sfn edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 July 5. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 03:52, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

SNPedia-Templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy moved. to Rich's userspace. Izno (talk) 16:26, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Currently unused, they seem not very useful (anymore). TheImaCow (talk) 18:24, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Solar System invite edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:46, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Appears never to have been used (and is subst-only). Izno (talk) 18:19, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have notified the relevant WikiProject. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 19:50, 28 June 2020 (UTC).[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SNPedia/Rsnum edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy moved. To Rich's user space. Izno (talk) 16:27, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Currently unused, seems not very useful (anymore). TheImaCow (talk) 18:14, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SNCRR color edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:45, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Currently unused, seems not very useful (anymore). TheImaCow (talk) 18:14, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom. AlgaeGraphix (talk) 22:59, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:S-Bahn-B-S1 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:45, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WIP since 4,341 days, currently unused. TheImaCow (talk) 18:01, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom. AlgaeGraphix (talk) 22:59, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:LK-linia edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:45, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. AlgaeGraphix (talk) 17:16, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:MapframeForObjects edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:42, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fork of Module:Mapframe that is no longer needed. The bug mentioned in the doc has been resolved, plus Module:Mapframe does not set frame latitude/longitude when they can be derived from line or shape features. Evad37 [talk] 13:12, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom.--Tom (LT) (talk) 06:06, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have no objection against deletion but my requirement is that someone forwards/links/transcludes (or whatever the correct word is) Template:MapframeForObjects to Template:Maplink so that no map gets broken or mass edits pages where Template:MapframeForObjects is used to replace it with Template:Maplink. Froward via the Template:MapframeForObjects may be simpler solution for now - but I do not know how to do it.--Kozuch (talk) 16:22, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Kozuch: Yes, we don't want anything to break; fortunately it will be simple for the closer to do in this case. {{MapframeForObjects}} uses exactly the same parameters as {{Maplink}}, so it can either be made into a template redirect, or each transclusion (there's only 55) can have the template name "MapframeForObjects" replaced with "Maplink". - Evad37 [talk] 01:07, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2020_June_27&oldid=966106107"