Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 August 7

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< August 6 August 8 >

August 7 edit

Template:Kolkata Metro Line 2 Route edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused; duplicates information in {{Kolkata metro line 2 new}}. AlgaeGraphix (talk) 15:09, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ISO 639 code-1 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G8 by Izno (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:06, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused set of templates, which are based on Module:ISO 639 which is being deleted. Gonnym (talk) 11:35, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy delete as G8 (once Module:ISO 639 is actually deleted) * Pppery * it has begun... 13:43, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete I would G8 this as well, especially when considering Per the discussion, only the functionality that is currently employed by active transclusions of Module:ISO 639 need to be included in the merger from the close. --Trialpears (talk) 17:53, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Volleyball national squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 August 20. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 02:30, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WCSquadLink edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:14, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These templates are not useful as they only provide a simple wikilink, normal links should be used instead. S.A. Julio (talk) 10:01, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. S.A. Julio (talk) 10:04, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lymphatic organ neoplasia edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Lymphatic organ and vessel disease. Primefac (talk) 22:51, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Lymphatic organ neoplasia with Template:Lymphatic organ and vessel disease.
There are only three unique entries here. It would be easier and also mean that these entries are placed adjacent to other diseases affecting the thymus and spleen for the templates to be merged Tom (LT) (talk) 07:58, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Endocrine pathology edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete after conversion described in nomination. Primefac (talk) 22:51, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I propose that this super template is converted to a list, List of endocrine diseases, and split up into a wide variety of child templates based mainly on the second order titles (eg {{Disease of the pancreas and glucose metabolism}}, {{Parathyroid disease}}, etc.)

This template is massive and because of this provides very little useful navigational value. Additionally, so much content is completely unrelated - eg linking parathyroid disease and complications of type two diabetes; or goitre and postorgasmic illness syndrome in the same template is pointless and confusing.

I think it would be better for readers to have a set of templates smaller in scope, and it will also make it easier for new editors to keep the navbox up-to-date. Lastly, I note that two editors have already made similar concerns on the talk page (about length and readability). One other editor disagreed with this. All three editors appear to be inactive. Tom (LT) (talk) 04:50, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete after replacement per nom. --Izno (talk) 17:43, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Technology topics edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 August 21. Primefac (talk) 23:16, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Floorball-vs-team start edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused set of templates. Was used only once and was replaced with Module:Sports table/Custom. Gonnym (talk) 01:02, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2020_August_7&oldid=974252247"