Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 August 26

August 26 edit

Template:2019 Netball Superleague ladder edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:02, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

no longer used after being merged with the parent article (with attribution) per prior consensus here at TFD. Frietjes (talk) 22:38, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. --Gonnym (talk) 09:44, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete attribution in the edit summary looks proper so no need to keep these around. Wug·a·po·des 21:33, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
@Frietjes: As a regular editor of netball articles I'd like to say thanks for inviting us to this discussion. Several of these templates for recent seasons were used across several articles. Great job in messing up these articles. User:Djln Djln (talk) 20:52, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Uw-ew-april edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete (G7); deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:06, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think there was ever consensus to create such a template. Plus, we do not need to create redundant policy templates for one-time events like April Fool's day. Policies and guidelines still apply on April Fool's day. Either delete or move to userspace. Aasim 20:21, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Language/data/iana edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:02, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused module with unclear purpose. If it's meant as Module:Language/data/iana languages, then we already have that. Gonnym (talk) 16:37, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: Duplicate module. Aasim 15:05, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete one edit in 2018 and no content so no use keeping it around. Presumably the documentation subpage will be deleted as well? Wug·a·po·des 21:36, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ConvertAbbrev/ISO 639-1 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 September 4. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:33, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Multiple pronouns edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 September 4. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:33, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).