Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 April 13

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< April 12 April 14 >

April 13 edit

Template:Tay Coast Line edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 01:45, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused; an over-simplified version of Template:Edinburgh to Aberdeen Line. AlgaeGraphix (talk) 20:28, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:G8-Justice edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 April 28. Primefac (talk) 01:45, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sydney Film Festival edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:41, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Eponymous navbox for a film festival, without the volume of spinoff content needed to warrant a navbox. Other than the topic's head article itself, this comprises 15 red links and just two blue ones -- and one of the two blue links is just a redirect back to the same head article, while the other is a pointless content fork that is up for AFD as it literally just contains section headers without any actual content -- meaning that this exists solely to link the head article back to itself and a boilerplate spinoff that has no encyclopedic value in its current form. Obviously no prejudice against recreation in the future if and when somebody actually starts to tackle creating the redlinked articles, but under current circumstances this isn't serving any useful navigational purpose. Bearcat (talk) 17:18, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The Yoga Guru edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:53, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The editor who made this was blocked indefinitely not long after its creation. And it fails WP:B2G. Jerm (talk) 15:09, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, it was created today (April 13). Jerm (talk) 17:30, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CenturyCategoryNav edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:05, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, now that I have replaced its last half-dozen uses with the much superior {{Navseasoncats}}. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 06:19, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Armenia national football team results edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:32, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The template is now useless with it being incorporated into the Template:Armenia national football team and the Template:Football results UEFA HawkAussie (talk) 02:58, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 16:06, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Dtl edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Use or otherwise linking to examples in the template-space documentation is a discussion to be had elsewhere. Primefac (talk) 00:04, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is linking to templates on Wikidata really common enough to warrant a custom template? (The vast majority of the 85 transclusions are through the example in Template:Template-linking templates). Suggest subst and delete * Pppery * it has begun... 20:36, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose (as creator) - this is a useful template for referencing Wikidata templates from enwiki. Low usage might be attributed to relatively low cross-wiki participation/communication, which I thought we want to foster.   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  15:01, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:01, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:28, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • If the template is kept, then could we please leave it out of the index at Template:Template-linking templates? It's already confusing to look for the right template, and we don't need to clutter the list with an entry for a template with as unusual a role as linking to templates on a sister project. – Uanfala (talk) 15:46, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Aside from minor formatting issues, {{dtl|Example}} is the same as {{tl2|Example|sister=d}}, so it could potentially be converted into a wrapper (again, assuming it's kept), but then again I suppose we run the risk of needing wrappers for every sister project. for the record I have no opinions on this template, just commenting on what I know about the template family Primefac (talk) 15:56, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2020_April_13&oldid=953596406"