Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 September 26

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< September 25 September 27 >

September 26 edit

Template:10years edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Replace and delete. (non-admin closure) --Trialpears (talk) 18:01, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a semi-procedural nomination for this template. It was nominated for merging about six weeks ago with the result being to merge into {{navseasoncats}}. What was not taken into consideration during the merge was that {{10years}} adds a lot of categorization, which {{navseasoncats}} does not. Historically/conventionally this is one of the reasons why we do not assign categories (except for maintenance cats) via template - if the template is changed or deleted the entire category structure goes out the window.
I am recommending deletion of this template following a full substitution of its existing functions (once they get ironed out). This will preserve the category structure originally found in {{10years}} but actually implement the decision found in the previous TFD (i.e. keeping this template from becoming a franken-wrapper).
In other words, categorization of pages using this template should be done manually, not via the template. Primefac (talk) 23:18, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • As the editor who reinstated and expanded the categories provided by this template, I have no objection to the above. I envisaged that the categories by year (establishments, introductions etc) would be a temporary measure until the template got fully replaced. I added more than was there before in case it was helpful to build out gaps in the existing structure.
User:BrownHairedGirl has already created one new template {{BuildingCompletedYr}} for a large set (buildings and structures by year) and may have more in mind. Note that such new templates do now build categories, much more simply and reliably than the old ones as they need no parameters.
Also, note that another template {{cat nav 10years}} exists with similar usage, having different parameters and happening to be used for a different bunch of category series. – Fayenatic London 07:21, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2004 Liga Super table edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:45, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged with the parent article (with attribution) per consensus at WT:FOOTY Frietjes (talk) 19:06, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 09:35, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NGHTCRWLRS edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Fenix down (talk) 09:34, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Premature; navbox contains just three blue links but the articles are already sufficiently interlinked. (Creator is currently indef blocked.) PC78 (talk) 18:39, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WXW Women's Championship edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. No predjudice for renomination if no new links are added in the coming year. (non-admin closure) --Trialpears (talk) 17:58, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So few links it is not needed Galatz גאליץשיחה Talk 17:09, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: as this is an ongoing championship, there appears to be potential for growth, both as new champions are named, and as champions achieve wider notability so that Wikipedia articles are written about them. – Fayenatic London 07:28, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep there seems to be enough potential in this navbox. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 06:01, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • weak keep, but I would definitely reconsider if there is no additional content a year from now. Frietjes (talk) 13:36, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2019_September_26&oldid=919771430"