Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 October 9

October 9

Template:Module category

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Template category. No opposition, reasonable request. Primefac (talk) 11:10, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

• Template:Module category (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Template category (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Module category with Template:Template category.
{{Template category}} has slightly more features supporting type, onright and container parameters. By adding module and meta module types (with appropriate text and image changes) module categories could also benefit from these additional features. --Trialpears (talk) 08:18, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:47, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Omamori Himari

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 02:32, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

• Template:Omamori Himari (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is too underlinked to be of any navigational use. We already have Category:Omamori Himari, and wiki-links to the other articles throughout the text in the individual articles. Knowledgekid87 (talk) 16:55, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:47, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:NENAN, the links we need are already in the category. Hansen Sebastian^Talk 12:36, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1996–97 Division II Independent ice hockey standings (men)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:31, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

• Template:1996–97 Division II Independent ice hockey standings (men) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN A standing of just one school (I assume, as the link goes to a disambiguation page) The Banner talk 09:36, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

I'm building these templates one team at a time, though I did fix the disambiguation link. PensRule11385 (talk) 14:07, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:45, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

• weak keep, seems no worse than all the rest in Category:NCAA Division II Independent ice hockey standings (men), however I could see a benefit to merging all of them with a parent article (using module:sports table) if a parent article existed. Frietjes (talk) 15:10, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
• Keep Not a navbox so NENAN doesn't apply, would support merging with parent article though. --Trialpears (talk) 08:48, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1997–98 Division II Independent ice hockey standings (men)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:31, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

• Template:1997–98 Division II Independent ice hockey standings (men) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN A standing of just two schools (with one unknown, as the link goes to a disambiguation page) The Banner talk 09:37, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

I'm building these templates one team at a time, though I did fix the disambiguation link. PensRule11385 (talk) 14:07, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:45, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

• weak keep, seems no worse than all the rest in Category:NCAA Division II Independent ice hockey standings (men), however I could see a benefit to merging all of them with a parent article (using module:sports table) if a parent article existed. Frietjes (talk) 15:10, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
• Keep Not a navbox so NENAN doesn't apply, would support merging with parent article though. --Trialpears (talk) 08:47, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).