Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 October 7

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< October 6 October 8 >

October 7 edit

Template:SSJeffries edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 01:35, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This navigational template is for a fictional family from the soap opera, Shortland Street. There is no parent article for the family, only six of the nine links are articles, the six articles are already connected by the better Template:Shortland Street and only three article currently uses this template. Aspects (talk) 23:56, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SSMcKenna edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 01:34, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This navigational template is for a fictional family from the soap opera, Shortland Street. There is no parent article for the family, only seven of the twelve links are articles, the seven articles are already connected by the better Template:Shortland Street and only one article currently uses this template. Aspects (talk) 23:52, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SSWarner edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 01:34, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This navigational template is for a fictional family from the soap opera, Shortland Street. There is no parent article for the family, only four of the seven links are articles, the four articles are already connected by the better Template:Shortland Street and only two articles currently use this template. Aspects (talk) 23:48, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Portal generator - city (from outline) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 01:33, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This kind of automated portal was rejected at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/City portals cloned from outline pages * Pppery * it has begun... 22:04, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Tag as {{historical}}. Provides some background regarding MfD matters. Also, there was some talk somewhere months ago (don't remember exactly where offhand) about using these templates to possibly create navigation boxes, so it may come in handy for this. North America1000 10:05, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    This template is linked only from lists of unused templates and links related to the ongoing TfD. I don't see how tagging it as {{historical}} will provide background in any way. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:17, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Redundant with {{Basic portal start page}}.Guilherme Burn (talk) 15:26, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, unused per above. Frietjes (talk) 15:21, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hindustani-speaking areas of India edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 October 15. Primefac (talk) 01:32, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Box portal skeleton edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep and mark as historical Primefac (talk) 01:32, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:TFD#REASONS#3. I see no benefit in keeping this template for historical reasons, it still was linked in {{Portal templates navbox}} confusing the editors. Guilherme Burn (talk) 17:50, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Wanna hear from AfroThundr3007730 who tagged it as historical. If there isn't any good reason to keep it I'm inclined to support just to avoid confusion in the future. --Trialpears (talk) 17:57, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Trialpears: I tagged it as historical because it used to be a widely used portal creation template, which many of the older portals are still watermarked with. Keeping it as historical seems like a good solution for this one. — AfroThundr (u · t · c) 05:51, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Per WP:TFD#REASONS#3, it may be better to keep this template as it is in use in substituted form on 280 live pages. Certes (talk) 20:17, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Tag as {{historical}}. Provides some background regarding portals. Also, the nominator here already removed the link from the Template:Portal templates navbox page (diff), so outright deletion doesn't particularly seem necessary now anyway. Also, some editors may want to learn about the template after seeing the hidden comment in portals stating, "<!-- This portal was created using subst:box portal skeleton -->". North America1000 10:12, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Still a template in use, per the reason cited by Certes above. --Cactus.man ✍ 16:17, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep If one of these has to be deleted, it should be Template:Basic portal start page (because it produces navbox-clone portals that have been rejected by consensus), not this template. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:12, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2019–20 Zambia Super League table edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete, deleted by User:Fastily. Primefac (talk) 01:22, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged with the parent article (with attribution) per consensus at WT:FOOTY and here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, ... Frietjes (talk) 17:47, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 08:39, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Substantive human rights edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 October 15. Primefac (talk) 01:20, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Scotland Six Nations squad templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 01:19, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

While it is a great honour for a rugby player to be selected for his country's Six Nations squad, it is a tournament that happens every year, and for a player with a long career, this would open the door to a massive amount of navbox clutter. Even if we limited it to the winning nation each year, that would still exclude these templates, as Scotland have not won this tournament since 1999, before it was expanded to the now familiar Six Nations format. – PeeJay 10:30, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:GT Cup Open Europe years edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 01:16, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox with nothing to navigate to. There's only one redlinked title in the content section, so the only link in the entire box is the header itself -- and the box's only transclusion is in the same "header" article, so it results in that article navboxing to itself and nothing else. Bearcat (talk) 01:55, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Rugby sevens templates v2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete -FASTILY 00:20, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Useless templates as these have already gone into the main article. HawkAussie (talk) 00:38, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CSM București rugby squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete author request. RHaworth is doing this in Craiova, Romania — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:14, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CSM București rugby section was terminated this summer, so I request deletion for this template. [source: https://frr.ro/2019/08/14/federatia-romana-de-rugby-comunicat-de-presa-legat-de-situatia-clubului-csm-bucuresti-14-august-2019/] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gabinho (talk • contribs) 09:16, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • speedy delete per author request. Frietjes (talk) 15:20, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2019_October_7&oldid=1078907402"