Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 November 23

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< November 22 November 24 >

November 23 edit

Template:PFC Spartak Nalchik squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 23:23, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox of a football club whose players were determined here not to be fully pro and therefore not notable. Most of the articles are being deleted as we speak, and of the two remaining players, both of them don't appear to have played for any WP:FPLs. ミラP 19:31, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 10:02, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, does not serve its purpose as a navigation box. GiantSnowman 10:04, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:50 largest US magazines edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 23:24, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Based on arbitrary criteria, not supported by any WP:RS that we should include the top 50. Also, very volatile as circulation continously changes so we have to update the template more often. List already does a decent job. Störm (talk) 18:30, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:50 largest US banks edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 23:24, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Based on arbitrary criteria, not supported by any WP:RS that we should include the top 50. Also, very volatile with each quarterly report we have to update the template. List already does a decent job. Störm (talk) 18:27, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, better to use a list article. Frietjes (talk) 17:57, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:RFCUsummary edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This template is unused and Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct has been closed down so this template will not ever be useful. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:22, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:RFAReview edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template and unnecessary because Wikipedia:RfA Review hasn't been active in over 11 years. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:20, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment No particular objection, necessarily, as the project is well and truly inactive. I'd suggest that marking the template as historical or moving its contents to a subpage of WP:RFAR would harm little, and would preserve part of the overall effort, should we attempt something similar in the future. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 02:36, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:RBE edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused foreign language template. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:15, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:R&B and Soul Music Selected biography edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:R&B and Soul Music no longer exists and has been superseded by Portal:Rhythm and blues so this template is useless and it is unused. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:13, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Queen Manthatisi (ca.1784-1836 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Blanked by author Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:20, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and useless template. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:11, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment This was originally a draft, and there may be some content that could be salvageable or copyright concerns if this gets deleted. Haven't investigated it further. ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 01:59, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Puir edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:24, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This template is based on Template:PUIresolved which has been deleted. This template is not required because when it is substed, it will attempt to subst Template:PUIresolved which has been deleted. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:08, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Prism dual polyhedra db edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:59, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Portal editable edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:49, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, not needed, and if this feature is useful, it could be added as an option to Module:Portal without using a separate template. Frietjes (talk) 17:00, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Portal editable/Images/Switzerland edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:48, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, not needed, and if this feature is useful, it could be added as an option to Module:Portal without using a separate template. Frietjes (talk) 17:00, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PWBSPpages edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete dependent page of a page which does not exist. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:27, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This unused template only contains red links from a deleted portal so it is useless. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:45, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PWBSApages edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per nominator. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:30, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This unused template only contains red links from a deleted portal so it is useless. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:45, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PWBSAC-instructions edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per nominator. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:30, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This unused template only contains red links from a deleted portal so it is useless. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:44, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Trams portal/FA image edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was deleted by User:Fastily (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 17:21, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This template is unused and Portal:Trams has been deleted so this template is useless. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PIIMSAC-instructions edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per nominator. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:29, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This unused template only contains red links for a deleted portal and has no foreseeable encyclopedic use. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:15, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PHPSPpages edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per nominator. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:28, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This template only contains red links from a deleted portal. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:13, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Observances edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template and redundant to the function of {{MonthCategoryNav|topic=observances}} Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:05, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:OWShubmaps edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete dependent page of a page which does not exist. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:26, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:02, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NowCommonsBot edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This template was previously used by User:MetsBot but that bot has been indefinitely blocked. It is currently unused and I don't think that there is a use for this template in the future. Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:54, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NowCommonsReviewed edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This template was previously used by User:MetsBot but that bot has been indefinitely blocked. It is currently unused and I don't think there is a use for this template in the future. Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:52, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Note link edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:35, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Note-start edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:07, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:34, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Primera División de Fútbol Profesional – Apertura 2015 table edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:16, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged with the parent article (with attribution) per consensus at WT:FOOTY Frietjes (talk) 15:34, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 10:02, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2017 CONCACAF U-17 Championship – Group A standings edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:16, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged with the parent article (with attribution) per consensus at WT:FOOTY Frietjes (talk) 14:28, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 10:02, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Major English-language Science and Technology Magazines edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:19, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See previous discussion for reference, started by the same user on major current affair, arts, busines magazines. Selective navigation, no criteria which magazine to include (very subjective), fails WP:NAVBOX. Störm (talk) 06:40, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Fails WP:NAVBOX#3: The articles do not refer to each other to a reasonable extent. Category-based navigation is sufficient, and if any sci/tech publication is particularly relevant to another, either reference in prose or the See also section. czar 23:32, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I love navboxes and this would be very convenient for navigating between related magazines; or,
Alternatively, convert to a portal, maybe? (Half in jest, but thought I'd tag BrownHairedGirl here...maybe she'll get the [dark? dry?] humour.) [[--Doug Mehus T·C 22:54, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:01, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2019_November_23&oldid=928988314"