Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 November 13

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< November 12 November 14 >

November 13 edit

Template:Ligue 1 teamlist edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Merge. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:41, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Ligue 1 teamlist with Template:Ligue 1.
The "team list" template is more than a team list, so it makes sense to use the more generic name. Frietjes (talk) 22:50, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 09:45, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge as per example of {{Premier League}}. GiantSnowman 09:47, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment This is very common practice used with a ton of leagues as can be seen in this search. Pherhaps a bigger discussion at WT:FOOTY about all these templates would be in place if they're considered a problem. ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 23:11, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2019 Campeonato Brasileiro Série B table edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged with the parent article (with attribution) per consensus at WT:FOOTY Frietjes (talk) 14:00, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 09:45, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Premios Juventud for Girl of my Dreams edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:32, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary template that is linked to an irrelevant award category that does not even have a page. --Leo Mercury (talk) 13:12, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 12:26, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Martyrs of Pakistan edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Biased template. Fails WP:NAVBOX. Störm (talk) 12:06, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The Mandalorian edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Star Wars. Merge arguments are stronger with a keep !vote being the navbox equivalent of WP:clearly notable and delete votes sharing the general idea that there aren't enough links for a standalone navbox. (non-admin closure) ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 00:44, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Massively fails WP:NENAN with only two actual links (the rest were redirects and plaintext). This template shouldn't exist until at least a second season. -- /Alex/21 06:09, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Given the scope of the show, its hype and being the most expensive tv show ever produced it is only logical that is will have a navbox. Valoem talk contrib 06:22, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Valoem, that's not a guideline or policy reason to keep it. What does this navbox do that the article(s) currently do not do? Please read WP:NENAN. -- /Alex/21 06:36, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, the succession links in the episode infoboxes are sufficient. Frietjes (talk) 13:56, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge with Template:Star Wars to display the episode titles/season in parentheses as done on the Template:Marvel Cinematic Universe for those television series. This would make it easier for navigation and a better formatting, especially since the show is fairly new. We can demerge it once it gains another season. Trailblazer101 (talk) 15:55, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and expand - it's three articles (main article, episode one, episode two) and growing. The related article Mandalorian should also be linked. Template:Star Wars is too bloated and shouldn't include individual episodes. —МандичкаYO 😜 18:10, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Expand with what? Even if there's a full set of eight episodes, there's not enough for a navbox. All the articles are already linked from the parent article. Once there's season or a list-of-episodes article, maybe. -- /Alex/21 22:08, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge with Template:Star Wars as per Trailblazer101, and delete the articles for individual episodes as content forks. --Andrensath (talk | contribs) 04:51, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2015 Campeonato Brasileiro Série B table edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged with the parent article (with attribution) per consensus at WT:FOOTY Frietjes (talk) 00:08, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 11:40, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2019_November_13&oldid=927530321"