Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 May 22

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< May 21 May 23 >

May 22 edit

Template:1995–96 Azadegan League table edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:50, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged (with attribution) with the parent article per consensus at WT:FOOTY Frietjes (talk) 21:32, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 14:45, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2019–20 Persian Gulf Pro League table edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Moved without redirect with comment "Per TfD" by Plastikspork (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

not needed since it will be included directly in 2019–20 Persian Gulf Pro League when the article is created Frietjes (talk) 21:11, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 14:45, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep nowhere for it to be merged to, currently. Create the article or withdraw the nomination. GiantSnowman 14:47, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Non-free architectural work edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:03, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose renaming

Ever since I repurposed this template in 2012, people are still constantly misusing it for architectural works that exist (which should be deleted as invalid fair use) or that used to exist (which may be kept under {{non-free historic image}} if appropriate). The new name would further emphasize the intent of the template. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:40, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I am choosing this venue per WP:IAR. These two need to be bundled together, but there is no way to do it in keeping with standard procedure, which would require the template to go on RM and the category to go on CfD. Since this is the typical place to bring bundled template/category noms, I am bringing it here. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:47, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: WP:RM could have been used as it is used for template renames and the category would just be a speedy request WP:C2D. --Gonnym (talk) 01:12, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:44, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Ukrainian raion edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. And convert to use {{Infobox settlement}} Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:53, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Replace and delete

District-specific wrapper for {{Infobox settlement}}, with limited transclusions, on pretty stable sets of articles. Subst:itution will reduce the maintenance overhead, reduce the cognitive burden for editors, and enable articles to benefit more immediately from improvements to the current parent template.

Note: Despite being named "Infobox settlement" the template is not only used for settlements. Per its documentation, Infobox settlement is "used to produce an Infobox for human settlements (cities, towns, villages, communities) as well as other administrative districts, counties, provinces, et cetera—in fact, any subdivision below the level of a country".

Other entities (oblasts, autonomous region, cities, villages ...) already transclude {{Infobox settlement}} directly.

Visualisation of Ukraine place infobox usage
Infobox usage on articles about places in Ukraine

89.12.75.224 (talk) 18:41, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Primefac, can you close this? 78.54.79.155 (talk) 01:41, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@JJMC89 and Primefac:, can you close this, so the outcome can be implemented? 77.11.95.39 (talk) 10:40, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Please be patient; this listing has only been "old" for two days, and we're all volunteers. Primefac (talk) 15:36, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Extant Life Peers of the United Kingdom edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. This template does exist in similar article form so there is a consensus. Primefac (talk) 16:30, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hardly a viable navigation template with hundreds of entries, much better done with categories and lists with this many entries. MilborneOne (talk) 18:40, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support: There are several problems with this template. First, as already mentioned, it has hundreds of entries, which also means hundreds of incoming links (which is a commonly discussed issue, caused by gigantic templates like this one). If there has to be templates, then at least split it by premiership. Also, the template name is wrong: a life peer is a person, and persons are not "extant", they are either living or dead. Peerages are extant or extinct. For life peers/peerages, this is irrelevant, for obvious reasons. HandsomeFella (talk) 21:51, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, as above. Bondegezou (talk) 10:32, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Question: Is there an article that breaks down the peers by premiership in which they were appointed, similar to the template? I'd oppose deletion if there is not, support deletion of there is. schetm (talk) 20:19, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Iran Men's squad 2015 WT Taekwondo World Championship edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 June 5. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:03, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Eliteserien and 2. divisjon table templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:40, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged (with attribution) with the parent article per consensus at WT:FOOTY Frietjes (talk) 13:47, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 14:46, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2019_May_22&oldid=1072192693"