Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 June 4

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< June 3 June 5 >

June 4 edit

Template:Deo Block edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:29, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pursuant to Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2019 May 28 and because there was a previous discussion cut short by a speedy deletion (due to sockpuppetry). I have no opinion myself, but pinging MarnetteD as the previous discussion participants. Note that I restored the template to a pre-IP sock version when removing the {{tempundelete}} Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:28, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Uanfala and MarnetteD: Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:29, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per my comments in the previous TfD. This is a standard navbox for the populated places in a given administrative unit. Yes, most of these places don't have articles yet, but four do, and that's enough in my opinion to justify having this navbox. I'll admit it's not great, but it's a step in the right direction and I dislike the idea of deleting it now and then recreating it from scratch when more articles get created. – Uanfala (talk) 19:25, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The navbox has dozens of items in it but only five links to articles, thus, it does not meet any of the criteria at Wikipedia:Navigation template#Properties especially WP:EXISTING. It is just clutter at the bottom of any of the five articles that it could be added to. I would say turn it into a list article if anyone is so inclined. MarnetteD|Talk 19:37, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, Deo Block does not have an article so this could probably be nuked per {{db-subpage}}. Even if it did have an article, this fails WP:NENAN. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:31, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, no parent article, and the list of villages apparently appears no where else. if someone wants to recreate the list, there is https://www.census2011.co.in/data/subdistrict/1485-deo-aurangabad-bihar.html to preserve the information. Frietjes (talk) 13:34, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox French region edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete after replacement with {{infobox settlement}}. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:43, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Replace and delete

Region-specific wrapper for {{Infobox settlement}}, with limited transclusions, on pretty stable sets of articles. Subst:itution will reduce the maintenance overhead, reduce the cognitive burden for editors, and enable articles to benefit more immediately from improvements to the current parent template.

Note: Despite being named "Infobox settlement" the template is not only used for settlements. Per its documentation, Infobox settlement is "used to produce an Infobox for human settlements (cities, towns, villages, communities) as well as other administrative districts, counties, provinces, et cetera—in fact, any subdivision below the level of a country".

  1. France is the only country having five wrappers, cf. Wikipedia:List_of_infoboxes/Geography_and_place#Place
  2. the nominated wrapper is the one with the fewest transclusions among the France-specific wrappers
  3. the nominated wrapper is the 2nd least transcluded infobox settlement wrapper, after a Canada-specific wrapper (which probably should be nominated for replace and delete also)
  4. only 13 such regions currently exist in Metropolitan France, the other current entities are not only regions but also departments and have their own ISO code
  5. in the doc it says "Based on the Template:Infobox German Bundesland", the latter infobox has been deleted
  6. no other EU member state has a specific infobox for first-level administrative entities.

77.11.73.22 (talk) 17:02, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Replace and delete per nom. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:32, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Replace and delete per nom. No specific fields. This is basically a copy-paste Infobox settlement.--Darwinek (talk) 22:49, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep (with a caveat). I see specific fields. If substitution is carried out "blank" fields will be present in the article. For a new user this will be confusing, as lets say they want to change the GDP value or the |NUTS= area for the EU, they will have to guess which "blank" parameter contains the value they need to change. Personally I would like to see that all the specific fields are dealt with, by being handled in the {{Infobox settlement}} template, before this is converted. Once the specific fields are dealt with, I see no issue with this being substituted. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 20:30, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    And by being handled I mean having the parameters |GDP= and |NUTS= in {{Infobox settlement}} before substitution. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 22:37, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Replace and delete per nom. JelgavaLV (talk) 13:46, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Navbox child edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:06, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Duplicates basic module functionality. – Jonesey95 (talk) 09:55, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sihanouk infoboxes edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:06, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This infobox template is not used anywhere because I put it directly into the article. It exists in only one article and is not reusable anywhere else. Article content should not exist in template space. – Jonesey95 (talk) 09:53, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bluebook GA edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:05, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused more than two years after its creation. Undocumented, so it's not possible to determine if it duplicates functionality in other templates that start with "Bluebook", of which there are at least seven. – Jonesey95 (talk) 08:05, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. --Gonnym (talk) 10:48, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment from nominator: apparently the creator, User:Seraphim System, has been blocked for abuse, so there does not appear to be a future for this template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:28, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bludov edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:05, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, and unlikely to be used in an article. Still mostly red links after seven years. – Jonesey95 (talk) 08:00, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Motorway sign edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:03, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template that's been superseded by a full graphics library for the various motorways. Imzadi 1979 → 03:40, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:XBIZ Foreign Female edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 June 11. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:15, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2019_June_4&oldid=901810732"