Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 June 18

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< June 17 June 19 >

June 18 edit

Template:AFC President's Cup 2005 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:52, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

single-use navbox, redundant to information already presented in the article Frietjes (talk) 18:32, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 10:06, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Nickels edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:53, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Per the comment made a few days ago at Template talk:Nickels, the articles that use this template also seem to include the template Template:Coinage (United States), and the content of this template just duplicates one of the rows of that template. Thus this template seems essentially redundant and therefore useless. Until a few minutes ago, the template was used in Nickel (United States coin), Liberty Head nickel, Shield nickel, Buffalo nickel, 1792 half disme, Jefferson nickel, and 1913 Liberty Head nickel. I just removed those uses, since they were redundant. While doing that, I found that one of those articles, 1913 Liberty Head nickel, did not already include Template:Coinage (United States), so I added that template and removed this one. —BarrelProof (talk) 17:23, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. I wouldn't bet a plug nickel for the survival of this one. Randy Kryn (talk) 19:14, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. @BarrelProof: according to this there are a lot more articles that either have the template but aren't listed on it, or are listed on it, but don't transclude the template. --Gonnym (talk) 19:17, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Just to be clear, that report is about Template:Coinage (United States), not Template:Nickels. —BarrelProof (talk) 20:19, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Gerald R. Molen edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:56, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not primary creator per WP:FILMNAV. See recent similar discussions regarding film producers: Scott Rudin, David Heyman, Tobey Maguire, Antony I. Ginnane, etc, etc. --woodensuperman 16:00, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Michael De Luca edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:56, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not primary creator per WP:FILMNAV. See recent similar discussions regarding film producers: Scott Rudin, David Heyman, Tobey Maguire, Antony I. Ginnane, etc, etc. --woodensuperman 15:43, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2015 UEFA European Under-21 Championship qualification Group 1 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:16, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged with the parent article (with attribution) per consensus at WT:FOOTY Frietjes (talk) 13:22, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 10:06, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:History split edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:56, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Does this template actually get any use? This template was created 3 years ago, but we also have {{History merge}}, which has its own respective Wikipedia namespace page (Wikipedia:Requests for history merge), as well as a category that is utilized frequently. If there is no evidence that this template is being used, then it may be better to delete it or redirect and/or merge it to Template:History merge so that pages that are tagged with the nominated template don't just sit in some administrative backlog for all eternity. Steel1943 (talk) 06:38, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I used this template a few months ago, and my request was acted upon within a day, so it does get some use. * Pppery * it has begun... 11:28, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hence, Keep. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:12, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Anthony Appleyard: * Pppery * it has begun... 16:57, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:LKFFCT edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:07, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary navbox for two albums that already link to and from each other without it. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 01:05, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete no parent article and only links two articles. Frietjes (talk) 17:15, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2019_June_18&oldid=1138372825"