Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 January 28

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< January 27 January 29 >

January 28 edit

Template:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia talk:Lua edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 February 7. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 21:41, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:T.U.F.F. Puppy edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:03, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough links to warrant a navbox. "Characters" redirects to main article. --woodensuperman 16:44, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Not enough links to warrant a navbox. --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:04, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Only 1 real link, the other is now a redirect. Nigej (talk) 16:58, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Not censored 2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:04, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No reason to keep this, not transcluded anywhere and now replaced by {{uw-notcensored1}} [Username Needed] 15:19, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Swindon Wildcats edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:05, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox with just one link. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:44, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Not enough links to warrant a navbox. --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:04, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Provides no useful navigational function. --woodensuperman 13:22, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Aldershot F.C. seasons edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:06, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox with just one link. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:26, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Not enough links to warrant a navbox. --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:04, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Provides no useful navigational function. --woodensuperman 13:22, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Currently has just 1 link, the final season (just a few matches) of this now defunct club, article created over 4 years ago. Seem unlikely more will be added soon. Nigej (talk) 17:04, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cardiff Devils edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:06, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox with zero links. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:21, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Not enough links to warrant a navbox. --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:04, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Provides no useful navigational function. --woodensuperman 13:22, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Nothing useful there. 3 random seasons, all of which are red links. Nigej (talk) 17:06, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2019_January_28&oldid=882262227"