Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 January 26

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< January 25 January 27 >

January 26 edit

Module:URIutil edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:36, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, many function are dependent on non-existent submodules {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 18:26, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Philadelphia Transportation Company templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 February 7. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 21:44, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Unused SEPTA Regional Rail S-line aliases edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 February 7. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 21:44, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Rocky and Bullwinkle story arc edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge Template:Infobox Rocky and Bullwinkle story arc into Template:Infobox television episode. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:39, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox Rocky and Bullwinkle story arc with Template:Infobox television episode.
Only 7 uses. No need for custom template. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 05:37, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge per nom. The only parameter lost is "Boris disguises" which can be covered in the plot section.--Tom (LT) (talk) 00:02, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge except for exceptions - |disguise= seems trivia and should be covered in the article if is important; |program= is used differently from |series= but for no reason. There should not be two different parameters for the series name. --Gonnym (talk) 07:50, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per above. U-Mos (talk) 02:13, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. I've been trying to figure what to do with this one for some time; Zackmann08 has cracked it. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:52, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Clearly a good idea. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:39, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per above. Aoba47 (talk) 10:37, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Inhumans IMAX edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 February 10. Primefac (talk) 02:55, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Sydney New Year's Eve edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 08:05, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Can just use Template:Infobox television episode Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 05:35, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Strongly oppose: I don't understand this nomination at all, given the parameters are wildly different to Infobox television episode. Television episode doesn't allow for Bridge effect, Fireworks by or nearly ALL of the other paramters this template uses. No reasoning given for "can just use Template:Infobox television episode" - I'd love to know the rationale. -- Whats new?(talk) 10:54, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong oppose and trout (1) This is transcluded (2) parameters are completely different (3) provides useful value in articles?--Tom (LT) (talk) 00:02, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong oppose Template is used, see events section of Template:Sydney New Year's Eve for the fifteen articles this is used in. TheDoctorWho (talk) 05:30, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ok well in my defense... https://tools.wmflabs.org/templatecount/index.php?lang=en&namespace=10&name=Infobox_Sydney_New_Year%27s_Eve#bottom --Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 05:50, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Zackmann08:The problem with relying on such tools. Do you want to go ahead and withdraw this TfD then, or do you still advocate it should be merged? -- Whats new?(talk) 06:08, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Zackmann08: In the future may I suggest checking the transclusion count within Wikipedia? For example with this specific template, from the "What Links Here" page you can set the namespace to article and it shows all 13 transclusions ([1]). As an alternative, also from the "What Links Here Page" you can click the "hide links" and "hide redirect" buttons to get almost an identical result ([2]). Both of those options allow you to do what the tool is supposed to do but get more reliable results. TheDoctorWho (talk) 06:19, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Arrowverse crossover episode edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 February 9. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 16:02, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Doctor Who race edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge Template:Infobox Doctor Who race into Template:Infobox fictional race. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:45, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox Doctor Who race with Template:Infobox fictional race.
No need for a separate infobox Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 05:26, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Star Trek race edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge Template:Infobox Star Trek race into Template:Infobox fictional race. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:46, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox Star Trek race with Template:Infobox fictional race.
No need for a separate infobox. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 05:25, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support per nom's rationale. Templates can be readily merged. --Tom (LT) (talk) 00:02, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support merge - per above. Templates are very similar and merging them will allow for other editors to more easliy access them and keep them up-to-date. --Gonnym (talk) 07:41, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:01, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Per nom. Nigej (talk) 16:07, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Buffyverse character edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge Template:Infobox Buffyverse character into Template:Infobox character. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:47, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox Buffyverse character with Template:Infobox fictional character.
No need for a separate infobox for just one franchise. The Optimistic One (talk) 07:15, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support templates are fairly similar and no information is lost. --Tom (LT) (talk) 00:02, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Supprt merge - As stated above, the templates are very similar and there is no need for forks for individual programs. --Gonnym (talk) 07:43, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:02, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Per nom. Nigej (talk) 16:07, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2019_January_26&oldid=882583082"