Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 January 13

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< January 12 January 14 >

January 13 edit

Template:Country data Südland edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:56, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No such country exists. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 22:06, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. The creator claims that "The Kingdom of Südland is a nation in the South Atlantic bordered by Arkland to the south a Antharr to the north and is on of only 2 constitutional monarchies in the entire archipelago." but it is presumably a hoax. Nigej (talk) 20:48, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Related changes edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move to Module:Sandbox/Galobtter/Related changes Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:50, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

pre-alpha module unlikely to be finished. 148.197.248.53 (talk) 18:36, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:United States Pacifist Party edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:58, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Too little content to justify its existence--articles are all pretty well interlinked already. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:09, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Justices of the Federal Court of Australia edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Links to the list in See also sections can be added as appropriate. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:01, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This navbox should be deleted as it does not meet the requirements of WP:NAVBOX. The judges are only tangentially related and an article on a judge is unlikely to refer to more than a couple of other judges. The existing list and category seem to be more appropriate. It seems to me to be unlikely that a person reading about a particular judge of the Federal Court will want to jump to another judge. This is particularly so when it is a sea of red, of the 48 current judges, 27 are currently red links, 7 are stubs. The template was even worse when it listed all 160 judges. I have raised this on the talk page, however there has been no suggestion as to why the template should be kept. I will notify users who have edited the template or inserted it in an article. Find bruce (talk) 01:10, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. The navbox in its original form was ridiculously long and longer than half the articles it linked to, and I don't see it as serving any useful purpose to readers even trimmed down - as Find bruce noted, it is unlikely a reader wanting to read about a particular Federal Court judge will want to leap to another judge. The Drover's Wife (talk) 01:40, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Seems to me that the link on the header to Justices of the Federal Court of Australia is more useful than the collapsed list itself, perhaps indicating that a "see also" might be a better way forward. Nigej (talk) 16:32, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The suggestion of adding see also: List of Judges of the Federal Court of Australia seems to me to be a good one. As the preson nominating this template for deletion I am happy to take on the work of improving things - is there an easy way to do this, or would I need to go through the list and add each individually ? Find bruce (talk) 04:09, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2019_January_13&oldid=880708263"