Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 December 16

December 16 edit

Template:German Empire Corps edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:German Empire Armies. No opposition after 2 relists indicating a WP:SILENT consensus. (non-admin closure) ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 00:28, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:German Empire Corps with Template:German Empire Armies.
Please see below. PPEMES (talk) 20:59, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:24, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 15:55, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:German Empire Divisions edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:German Empire Armies. No opposition after 2 relists indicating a WP:SILENT consensus. (non-admin closure) ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 00:28, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:German Empire Divisions with Template:German Empire Armies.
Would this be possible in order to accomplish something along these lines (but in Wikipedia template presentation)? PPEMES (talk) 20:59, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:24, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 15:55, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AFL Ladder/1990 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:42, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused after being merged with the parent article (with attribution) per consensus in prior deletion discussions and at WT:FOOTY. Frietjes (talk) 15:41, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Faisalabad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:40, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Limited related links. We can cover these using 'see also' section. Störm (talk) 12:35, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep "Faisalabad is the third-most-populous city of Pakistan. Historically one of the first planned cities within British India. It has been referred to as the 'Manchester of Pakistan." The city has a population of over 2 million people per the census conducted in 1998.

I am copying the above lines from the Wikipedia main article on Faisalabad city. Anyone that looks at this Faisalabad city article, would also see that there are 173 references there that back up and support the main article - Faisalabad. So it's totally unbelievable for me to see above statements by the Deletion nominator - "Limited related links." Ngrewal1 (talk) 23:21, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:What Is This? edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 December 24. (non-admin closure) ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 00:20, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Countries that haven't yet participated at major beauty pageants edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 00:19, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary template, unsourced Migsmigss (talk) 03:25, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).