Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 August 31

August 31 edit

Template:V0.5 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 03:08, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This banner appears to be of historical interest only; Version 0.5 is now 12 years old, the banner was stripped of its categories in 2017 so it no longer serves any functional purpose, and there appear to be only 645 transclusions remaining of the original 1,964 articles. Lists of the Version 0.5 articles are kept at Wikipedia:Version 0.5 and Wikipedia:Version 0.5/Alphabetical, so no information will be lost by removing the remaining banners. PC78 (talk) 23:54, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Mark as historical/defunct. It's quite clear that version 0.5 is dead. But those articles still remaining should remained marked in a way that shows it was part of the version 0.5 OhanaUnitedTalk page 04:14, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • To what end? The information is documented elsewhere. For those that remain it's just unnecessary talk page clutter. PC78 (talk) 06:20, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No value in template, deprecation really doesn't mean anything since there will be no more uses anyway. --Trialpears (talk) 19:17, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as obsolete. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:33, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tweede Divisie seasons edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Tweede Divisie. Primefac (talk) 03:03, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate information. These seasons are already included in Template:Tweede Divisie, a concise and well-organized template. gidonb (talk) 22:41, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Korea/rater-data.js edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 September 8. Primefac (talk) 03:08, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lil Tracy edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 23:16, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox with only one entry, so nothing to navigate to. And even the one entry is of dubious notability. Richard3120 (talk) 01:06, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Did not research the notability of the entry. Even IF fine the template is still created WP:TOOSOON. gidonb (talk) 00:22, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete There are only two articles and the EP should be redirected to the artist for being non-notable, so there are not enough articles to justify having a navigational template. Aspects (talk) 05:44, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).