Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 August 3

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< August 2 August 4 >

August 3 edit

Template:Gratitude edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:58, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The band's navigational template consists of three links: the band's article, an album and an album that redirects to the band. Since there are not enough notable releases to justify having a template, the two links already navigate to each other and WP:NENAN. Aspects (talk) 23:59, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Lacks enough links to warrant a navbox. czar 11:35, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, no significant navigational benefit. Frietjes (talk) 16:31, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The Go Set edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy G8: empty navbox. czar 11:34, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The band's navigational template consists of three links: the band's article and two albums that redirect back to the band. Since the band has no notable release, the template navigates nowhere and WP:NENAN. Aspects (talk) 23:58, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Tbilisi Metro templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:59, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

{{S-line}} and related templates for lines of the Tbilisi Metro. Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Tbilisi Metro. All transclusions replaced. There are four dependent s-line data modules which should also be deleted. BLAIXX 23:32, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Grand Rapids Rampage seasons edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Also covered within {{Grand Rapids Rampage}}. czar 00:22, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox with just two links. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:45, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2019 MPBL Game Schedule edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:00, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is basically a repetition of what can be seen at 2019–20 MPBL season#Results, in a worse presentation than the former. Howard the Duck (talk) 17:07, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Welcome Email edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:52, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user warning template has never been substituted onto a talk page. Unusually, the template has four transclusions; three are on user pages (mostly for reasons that elude me), where they can probably be substituted, and one (Consolidated Bank Ghana, in a reference) is probably a result of typing "we" as the template name instead of "cite web". Jc86035 (talk) 11:18, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:APFL edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:50, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NAVBOX with just two links. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:52, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mont-Saint-Hilaire line edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete and move Template:Mont-Saint-Hilaire Line (AMT) to its location. Primefac (talk) 13:25, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be almost an exact duplicate of {{Mont-Saint-Hilaire Line (AMT)}}. Jc86035 (talk) 10:21, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, per nom. Useddenim (talk) 12:57, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Do not delete, but rather delete {{Mont-Saint-Hilaire Line (AMT)}}; as the AMT does not exist anymore, or else merge both into one without the 'AMT' moniker.Piper13 (talk) 13:53, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete one of them but the name of the template that remains should be "Mont-Saint-Hilaire line". BLAIXX 23:39, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    @Blaixx and Piper13: I would note that {{Mont-Saint-Hilaire line}} is newer and would need to be history-merged if the other template was deleted due to the newer template initially being copied from the older template (which is also the case for {{Mascouche line}}). Jc86035 (talk) 15:37, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't think a histmerge is needed here. I think it would be okay to delete Mont-Saint-Hilaire line and then move the other one. BLAIXX 16:20, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • history merge where possible. Frietjes (talk) 16:30, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2019_August_3&oldid=910494352"