Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 August 27

August 27 edit

Template:Eduardo (rapper) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 04:43, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One album to this musician's name. This navbox offers no navigational benefit. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 17:59, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Not enough links....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:59, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete There are not enough articles to justify having a navigational template. Aspects (talk) 21:37, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Kumkum Bhagya edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 04:44, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the links in the template are Wikipedia:Pipelinked to other articles. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:01, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --Trialpears (talk) 15:04, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete After removing the character list and duplicates there are six links left. Two to companies that shouldn't be linked and are already appropriately linked, one to book it's based on which is already linked both ways and three related shows, one of which looks likely to be deleted in ongoing AfD. These are already appropriately linked making this template unnecessary. --Trialpears (talk) 20:02, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:0.7 set nominee edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:21, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This template encourages discussing the nomination of the article to Version 0.7 of the offline release of Wikipedia. This version was released in 2010 and there is no reason keeping a notice for a discussion that was closed 9 years ago. All 500 transclusions should be removed and the template deleted. --Trialpears (talk) 22:21, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --Trialpears (talk) 14:53, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2017–18 Croatian Second Football League table edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:05, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged with the parent article (with attribution) per consensus at WT:FOOTY and here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, ... Frietjes (talk) 13:01, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 10:15, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Halach edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per nominator — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:50, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused test/experiment by user with a history of unhelpful edits. Sample use: [1]. Mitch Ames (talk) 11:06, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).