Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 April 1

April 1 edit

Template:Scooter Braun edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:05, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Too little content. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 16:52, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete record labels to which an artist is signed shouldn't be on the template anyway. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 03:48, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Merged football league table templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 01:45, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

merged with article with attribution per this discussion. Frietjes (talk) 13:57, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 10:25, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Frietjes: why have you done this again? I have asked you at a previous discussion not to. GiantSnowman 14:39, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
this discussion is really for all of them, and the list will grow as I find more. I have marked each one that was added after the 2nd. I will strike your !vote again since you apparently want to examine each one. Frietjes (talk) 16:25, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Why have you struck my !vote? I simply wanted you to clarify why you have added extra templates to a discussion after the discussion has begun. Do I need to raise your conduct at ANI? I am deeply concerned. GiantSnowman 12:54, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete all per nom. (do not ping me to revote if Frietjes added more templates after my vote because I will still vote delete for more templates if I revote) Hhkohh (talk) 14:25, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

2012 AFC Champions League group tables edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:58, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Folk of Template:2012 AFC Champions League group tables and these templates uses non-standard format Hhkohh (talk) 06:39, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhkohh (talk) 06:46, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Popular Democratic Party (Puerto Rico) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:58, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused navbox Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:19, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Use? seems to link subjects in a notable fashion, should this be used?--Tom (LT) (talk) 04:00, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pretty similar to Template:PRPPDnominees in terms of the people listed there, but it has a different scope. I guess it can be used. --Gonnym (talk) 22:50, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 14:36, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 05:08, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Comics-trades edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Primefac (talk) 19:51, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused template. Seems to be a way to prep a page? No changes since 2011. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 21:01, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 04:42, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Culture of Malaysia edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 19:52, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused series navbox. Redundant to Template:Malaysia topics Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 21:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Template is used (if only once) - relisting for more input.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 04:37, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Seems there is some overlap with {{Life in Malaysia}} which is used in more articles, however it seems that the "Template:Culture of X" version is the one other countries use. --Gonnym (talk) 16:35, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Given it appears to just be a carbon copy of other templates, and is unused, Delete, and possibly redirect to Template:Life in Malaysia. CMD (talk) 09:36, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Listify edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. To Module:List and Module:String as appropriate. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:42, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Only used on several unused templates, redundant to Module:String {{#invoke:Listify|input|x|yyxyxyy}} -> <ul>{{#invoke:String|replace|yyxxyy|x|<li>%1</li>|plain=false}}</ul>. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 22:30, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not sure Module:String is the correct location. This is not a simple string, but rather a list, so maybe Module:List can work with this better. --Gonnym (talk) 07:25, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm not suggesting a merge, I'm suggesting a deletion because the functionality in this module can already be implemented using Module:String. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 14:35, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Not sure I agree. If instead of using the module directly, an editor now needs to surround it with a ul tag and then also add the logic for replace, that isn't helpful at all. If this is used, then the better solution would be to add this option to Module:List. --Gonnym (talk) 08:39, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I can't remember why I created this module. I tend to agree with Gonnym that the "string" module isn't really the most obvious name. Shrug. --MZMcBride (talk) 04:56, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:10, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 03:56, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

April Fools' Day nominations edit

Template:In the news edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Joke is over (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 00:53, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:IDONTLIKEIT[April Fools!] InvalidOStalk 00:25, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).