Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 September 19

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< September 18 September 20 >

September 19 edit

Template:Team Secret edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. No oppose (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 13:42, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Only has a single linked entry. Fails its sole purpose as a helpful navbox. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 19:46, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Not enough links....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:51, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:RankedMedalTable edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Deprecate old template (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 18:03, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deprecating Template:RankedMedalTable, Template:RankedMedalRow & Template:RankedMedalFooter in favor of Template:Medals table.
I have just completed {{Medals table}} which accomplishes what {{RankedMedalTable}}, {{RankedMedalRow}} and {{RankedMedalFooter}} do but in one template. Rank is automatically calculated as are the totals for each nation. I guarantee that there is room for improvement with {{Medals table}} and welcome any and all feedback. My proposal is to deprecate the use of these three templates in favor of using the new one. I don't think this is technically a case for merging, but want to get the discussion started. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:19, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Agree: Per nom. – BrandonXLF (t@lk) 22:25, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Agree --Kasper2006 (talk) 04:23, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Agree --Hddty. (talk) 06:45, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support deprecation of the three previous templates and continued improvement of the new template/module as the 7,000+ articles that use it are migrated and edge cases are found. I think it was premature to place deprecation notices on the three existing templates while this discussion is in progress, unless I missed a discussion somewhere. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:38, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Brisbane Metroads edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. No opposition. Primefac (talk) 21:46, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to Template:Road infrastructure in Brisbane. This was always rather redundant anyway but now this template has been fully integrated into that one. No other Australian capital city has an equivalent template - hence why I merged them. No transclusions. Satellizer el Bridget (Talk) 13:02, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Yanson Group of Bus Companies edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 October 1. Primefac (talk) 00:54, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rotherham Titans squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:08, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a navbox containing players in a rugby union squad. However, none of the players have an article, all the links are red links. TheMightyPeanut (talk) 04:18, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete. Navboxes are for navigation between articles but there are none, apart from the main which can list the names and already does.--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 08:10, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No links....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 09:52, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2016 Olympic Athletics Schedule edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 October 1. Primefac (talk) 00:56, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ISO 639 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 September 28. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 16:09, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ISO 639 code edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 September 28. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 16:09, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2018_September_19&oldid=1091625023"