Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 October 18

October 18 edit

Template:Infobox presidential administration edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox administration. Only oppose did not indicate any differences between the infoboxes that would make a merger a bad idea. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 08:00, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox presidential administration with Template:Infobox administration.
Both infoboxes serve the same purpose, and there is no good reason as to why they should remain separate to each other, with one being restricted to presidential administrations. Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 22:10, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support, no need to have two templates. If something needs to be customized for a presidential administration, that can be done. However, I am a little confused about the goals of these templates. They look very redundant to {{Infobox president}} or {{Infobox prime minister}}. What is intended exactly? Not all articles need a navbox… — JFG talk 11:13, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, infobox presidential administration was designd for use on pages on individual executive-branch presidencies in presidential systems of governance. It is wholly appropriate that a separate, albeit similar, infobox exists for use on pages on individual executive governments in parliamentary systems of governance. As the systems are different, there's no good reason as to why the two templates should be merged. Drdpw (talk) 06:37, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Drdpw, what is it about the formatting on {{Infobox administration}} that you take issue with? Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 17:03, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • support merge, no need for two infoboxes here. Frietjes (talk) 00:19, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:A History of Flyfishing by Conrad Voss Bark, (Merlin Unwin Books, 1992) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:52, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:47, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Dog breed navboxes by FCI classification edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 October 26. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:51, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FCI 6 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 October 26. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 08:54, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).