Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 November 18

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< November 17 November 19 >

November 18 edit

Template:Infobox Hall of Fame edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 November 26. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:39, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox technology festival edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox recurring event with the usual caveats about ensuring all parameter functionality being kept. Primefac (talk) 12:17, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox technology festival with Template:Infobox recurring event.
Technology festivals are recurring events. None of the parameters in the technology festival infobox are unique to technology festivals. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:05, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support. Chicbyaccident (talk) 21:38, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support quite a bit of overlapping parameters and indeed the parameters that are unique aren't specific to technology festivals. Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:44, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Can the nominator create a draft of the merged template for review? Ruslik_Zero 19:24, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support seems like a good idea Chetsford (talk) 10:54, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox bus accident edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox public transit accident (or other suitable name). (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:46, 26 November 2018 (UTC) close amended 06:02, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox bus accident with Template:Infobox rail accident as, say {{Infobox public transit accident}}.

Largely overlapping templates. The majority of differing parameters relate to maps which both templates should be able to use.

And what if a bus hits a train? ;-) Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:01, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Obviously we need {{Infobox grade crossing accident}} to cover that use case. Support, seems like an obvious merge candidate. "Public transit" may confuse people when it comes to freight-only incidents (it's only a name, but never mind). Mackensen (talk) 22:16, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge. Indeed most of the parameters do overlap, so a merger seems very suitable. I think there could be a struggle to come up with a fitting all-embracing name, so don't underestimate "Infobox bus or rail crash". (I believe it's the practice to avoid the word "accident".) --Bsherr (talk) 01:32, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge - if "public" is an issue then {{Infobox transit accident}} maybe? --Gonnym (talk) 08:09, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Highly sensitive edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Controversial. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 04:02, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Highly sensitive with Template:Controversial.
One might at first think these templates serve different purposes, because, after all, depending on the meaning, a controversial subject is not necessarily the same as a sensitive subject. However, Template:Highly sensitive urges neutrality, just like Template:Controversial, demonstrating that these templates are actually warning about the same thing. Even if Template:Highly sensitive were used in the other sense, to warn editors to be appreciative of others' emotions, it would probably be considered an impermissible WP:Content disclaimer. These templates should be merged, and then existing uses of Template:Highly sensitive should be evaluated to ensure it is used on controversial subjects as opposed to just sensitive ones. Bsherr (talk) 18:35, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support – per nom. I created this template based on a note that I saw on Talk:September 11 attacks (diff), and so I thought that I should create a template to add to the talk pages of other articles to which the "highly sensitive" "rule" applies (such as rape, murder and pedophilia). But now looking at Bsherr's rationale, I agree that the template serves the same purpose as the Controversial template, so merging is appropriate. LinguistunEinsuno (Linguist111) 00:33, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. {{controversial}} and {{controversial-issues}} are better. wumbolo ^^^ 20:36, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nominator's rationale + Wumbolo pointers — JFG talk 04:35, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support merge. We could add a parameter to whichever one survives to keep the wording (|controversial=yes or |sensitive=yes), defaulting to controversial. Anarchyte (talk | work) 11:38, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge highly sensitive because they appear to serve the same purpose. I can imagine there are some cases where an entry might be "sensitive" without being controversial - e.g. John Siegenthaler might be sensitive because a high-profile BLP violation on that page could potentially generate a lot of press coverage, but it doesn't appear the template is used this way. Nblund talk 18:34, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Merge Highly sensitive seems like a TLDR of controversial. Highly sensitive seems more eye catching however. Perhaps a merger could combine the two styles.-Serialjoepsycho- (talk) 03:47, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Test edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 November 26. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 04:05, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Voooltdj sandbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 13:15, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently a test edit by new user. David Biddulph (talk) 10:03, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
  • Speedy-deleted under criterion G2 as an editing test outside userspace. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 13:21, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Northeastern Huskies football navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Primefac (talk) 00:22, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NAVBOX with just three links ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:37, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep; has four blue links including the title. Jweiss11 (talk) 00:29, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep Just 3 or 4 links is not a good reason to delete a navbox. navbox works well to me. Hhkohh (talk) 09:36, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter (pingó mió) 10:03, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep; 3-4 links is sufficient, and there's clear potential for expansion. Mackensen (talk) 16:11, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Quad City Steamwheelers roster edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. It has already been merged as suggested. Ruslik_Zero 19:19, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Team has been defunct since 2009. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 15:26, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter (pingó mió) 10:01, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WakeUpPresenters edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. No opposition, reasonable arguments. Primefac (talk) 00:21, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary template for a short-lived, unremarkable breakfast news television program. Only 3 linked articles within, and their involvement with this program is far from the most notable role in any of their careers. -- Whats new?(talk) 05:46, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:45, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tnc edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 November 27. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:37, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Conduct discussion edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 November 26. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 04:06, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Guinean films edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete with a minor note that assuming the competence of a user is unnecessary and borders on a personal attack - if the template itself is useless, that's fine, but let's not go any farther than that. Primefac (talk) 00:19, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Created by incompetent newbie to support a bunch of non-notable stubs, all of which end up at AfD and being redirected to List of Guinean films. Softlavender (talk) 09:23, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the reminder, I remind you for my contribution in English is the culmination of a link that I followed to create the temple Guinean films, and all that is related. I urge you to help me create a redirection to French. I am a beginner to wikimedia English, I did not want to find myself here so improved the article if Wikipedia is a collaborative project instead of deleted. Aboubacarkhoraa (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:35, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Most links now redirect to one single article, making this template useless. Ajf773 (talk) 18:59, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete useless Hhkohh (talk) 08:19, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox sports draft edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 November 26. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:48, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox LDS Temple edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 November 26. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 04:16, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Planetbox begin edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 November 27. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 06:20, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2018_November_18&oldid=871342038"