Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 March 27

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< March 26 March 28 >

March 27 edit

Template:4 Non Blondes edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Primefac (talk) 02:59, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NENAN: this only navigates one album, one song, and three of eight band members. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:36, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, User:Jax 0677 for fixing my mistake. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:41, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Linking to previous CfD. Definite borderline case. Note that NENAN doesn't count the link to the main article as one of the five. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 00:15, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:40, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per rule of five. Never heard of them. Randy Kryn (talk) 00:41, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete. Borderline case as others have pointed out. Articles are well linked, so it does seem unnecessary, and it's unlikely to ever get bigger. The only navigation the articles do not already provide are from the single to the band members, which could easily be remedied through a "personnel" section. --woodensuperman 08:34, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - This navbox was kept with six articles, and it now have seven articles with the addition of Dawn Richardson. --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:21, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Good find. It was an already existing article. And in the "Rule of five" it counts as six articles, as the parent article isn't counted. Randy Kryn (talk) 23:41, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Administrative law in the People's Republic of China edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 April 4. Primefac (talk) 03:00, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Phonemetra edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 April 4. Primefac (talk) 03:01, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Colocationwebhost-soft edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Primefac (talk) 03:01, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Same as Colocationwebhost and anonblock, useless template, plus orphaned template. 2A02:C7F:963F:BA00:C9AB:1D0A:F284:1E2A (talk) 16:47, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Just because it's orphaned doesn't mean it's useless. lo prenu .katmakrofan. (talk) 17:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. This is meant for situations when we block merely because it's a webhost, while {{Colocationwebhost}} is for when it's a webhost that has already been abusing things. Moreover, this kind of template generally isn't transcluded: it's substituted on user talk pages, and it's transcluded in block rationales (if you put a template in the block rationale, it will be expanded when the user tries to edit), so this is most likely not orphaned. Nyttend (talk) 22:41, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ScreenActorsGuildAward CastMotionPicture edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 April 4. Primefac (talk) 03:04, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2018_March_27&oldid=834132287"