Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 March 1

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< February 28 March 2 >

March 1 edit

Template:List of publications intro edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 March 12. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 08:46, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bangladesh Squad 2006 ICC Champions Trophy edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:00, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

per recent consensus in the 16 February 2018 discussion, these are non-championship winning squads, which has been deemed excessive navigation. Frietjes (talk) 16:16, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Abishe, Dissident93, Joseph2302, Mamyles, Plastikspork, Steven (Editor), and Störm: notifying prior discussion participants. Frietjes (talk) 16:19, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Frietjes: I'm all in support to have a clear consensus whether we need these templates or not (But that should be in every sport, not only cricket) Please remove or withdraw two clearly notable navboxs, Template:West Indies Squad 2006 ICC Champions Trophy (runner-ups), Template:South Africa Squad 2006 ICC Champions Trophy (semi-finalists, cricket don't have 3rd position). Other should be discussed in conjunction with FIFA or other soccer tournament navboxes so we can have some thorough discussion. You can add them here or start separate nom. It feels like you are only nominating WP:CRIC templates as nowadays WP:CRIC is almost inactive. You are a specialist in templates field and I've no objection if we succeed in building a clear consensus. Störm (talk) 16:27, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tennis Explorer profile edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Clear WP:G11 violation. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 09:16, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is basically a front for a betting website and should not be regarded as a reliable source. The data its shows is largely already available on other profiles (ATP, WTA). Wolbo (talk) 15:05, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

G11 is for deletion of articles. Christian75 (talk) 18:56, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Christian75, see Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#List of criteria: G = General and A = Article. Frietjes (talk) 23:44, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep or better argument. The links I checked was all for external links. Christian75 (talk) 18:56, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, gambling website. Frietjes (talk) 23:45, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Extended statistics about matches by surface, by type of venue. (Gabinho>:) 20:40, 7 March 2018 (UTC))[reply]
  • Delete, looks like G11 to me per Kirbanzo. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:13, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Must Be The Music edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 07:46, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:PERFNAV. --woodensuperman 14:52, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Football Focus edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 07:47, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is just a list of presenters, which fails WP:PERFNAV. --woodensuperman 14:50, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:USL Premier Development League Southwest Division stadiums edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 March 12. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 07:53, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Forest Reserves in Sri Lanka edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:07, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use template that was used at List of nature reserves in Sri Lanka. I've added the map directly into the article. The template has no further use. Rehman 14:26, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Child Ballads edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Userfy. Moved by template's creator. --woodensuperman 14:34, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is an article masquerading as a navbox. It's too convoluted to perform any useful navigational function. --woodensuperman 14:26, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Super useful all round to people that want an index though. I moved it to my user space because I need it. Prince of Thieves (talk) 14:29, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
An index in the format you are attempting would be better as an article, not a navbox. --woodensuperman 14:32, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You are probably right, the only reason I did it as a navbox was because I started building it from another template that was not as well organised. Prince of Thieves (talk) 14:34, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Variety Talk Series edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 March 12. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 08:26, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Uproar Festival edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. {{Taste of Chaos}} will need to be nominated for a period of seven days before it can be deleted. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 08:24, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The template doesn't have much in it, isn't really about the Uproar Festival topic, and almost duplicates Template:Taste of Chaos. —BarrelProof (talk) 00:35, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Country data Iroquois Confederacy edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 March 12. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 08:27, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2018_March_1&oldid=1073153472"