Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 June 27
June 27 edit
Module:I18n/ordinal edit
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. No opposition. Primefac (talk) 02:33, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
- Module:I18n/ordinal (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
No transclusions. This module is not useful on non-multilingual wikis. Jc86035 (talk) 22:25, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete as unused and useless. I must have missed this module when I nominated its ilk for deletion. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 16:30, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Wikidata property edit
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 July 8. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 11:04, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Caucus of Jason Kenney (2018) edit
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. No opposition. Primefac (talk) 02:34, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Unnecessary and inappropriate template. Jason Kenney is the leader of the opposition, not the premier, so his caucus is not the cabinet. Everybody in this template is already in {{Alberta MLAs}} anyway, so a separate template for the party caucus is not needed or wanted -- and, in fact, the only person this was actually being used on when I first caught it, David Dorward, is not even in the caucus at all, but is a non-incumbent candidate in the next election who would thus have no basis to even be included here at all yet. (And further, the template creator is actually strongly pinging my conflict of interest radar WRT Dorward, because he's their clear editing priority and they've been trying to do a lot of strange and non-standard things, e.g. double-infoboxing it, to get it singled out for special treatment that puts far too much WP:WEIGHT on the candidacy instead of on his existing notability claim.) There's simply no need for this, when the existing MLAs template already completely covers off the same information in the more appropriate context. Bearcat (talk) 14:50, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Unnecessary and inappropriate, indeed. Yintan 01:29, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Bold edit
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G4 by Anthony Appleyard (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:12, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- Template:Bold (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Based on Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 December 24#Template:Bold and Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 April 13#Template:Bold, it would seem there has already been consensus not to have a template like this. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 13:25, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Netflix documentaries edit
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:35, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
- Template:Netflix documentaries (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Speedy delete under WP:CSD#G4. Recreated template - consensus was already decided to delete at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 April 27#Template:Netflix films and documentaries. A split was mentioned, but the consensus was to delete. --woodensuperman 08:18, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- delete per prior discussion. Frietjes (talk) 12:07, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per prior discussion. Jc86035 (talk) 23:15, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per prevous consensus on similar Netflix templates. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 08:21, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per previous discussion/decisions on similar Netflix templates. —Joeyconnick (talk) 08:27, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per prior discussion Zarasophos (talk) 07:31, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Pre-1911 Chinese Military edit
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 July 8. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 11:04, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:SockmasterProven edit
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 July 9. Primefac (talk) 00:43, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
- Template:SockmasterProven (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Uw-sockblock (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Split sequence edit
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. No opposition Primefac (talk) 02:32, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
- Template:Split sequence (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Obsolete. No longer needed for intended purpose, and not used in any current articles. BilCat (talk) 01:44, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).