Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 June 25

< June 24	June 26 >

June 25

Module:About-distinguish

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 July 4. Primefac (talk) 16:33, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Module:About-distinguish (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Module:Labelled_list_hatnote (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Hatnote inline

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 July 4. Primefac (talk) 16:33, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Module:Hatnote_inline (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Module:Hatnote (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Other MeSH codes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 July 4. Primefac (talk) 16:33, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Module:Other_MeSH_codes (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:For outline

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Module:For outline. I suppose the final title should be reasonable and match the difference between "outline", "timeline", and "glossary", but that's something to be figured out after they're merged. Primefac (talk) 16:35, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Module:For outline (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Module:For timeline (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Module:For glossary (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Module:For outline, Module:For timeline and Module:For glossary.
Almost duplicate modules; only difference is list of pages to search and the text of the hatnote, which could be passed as parameters. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 17:01, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support. This is pretty silly to be in separate modules. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 17:53, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support: This broadly makes sense, but it seems like it'd be awkward code to pull each list of title patterns in through parameters. It'd probably be cleaner and more efficient to hard-code the sets of inputs and use a single parameter to choose between sets; we don't need these to be terribly dynamic. {{Nihiltres |talk |edits}} 20:27, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I always personally think that that kind of hard-coding is ugly; why not provide more flexibility with less code? {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 21:50, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
We don't actually need the extra flexibility for them. In fact, limiting flexibility can be valuable because it enforces consistency. While hard-coding values is inelegant, it is simple and effective. {{Nihiltres |talk |edits}} 01:51, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2017 USL season by team

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 16:35, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2017 USL season by team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Already exists at Template:2017 USL season, and this template is unused in mainspace. 21.colinthompson (talk) 15:56, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 11:38, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unnecessary duplicate. Giant Snowman 11:38, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) Delete per above. Hhkohh (talk) 11:40, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 09:59, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Details

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. No opposition. Primefac (talk) 16:37, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Module:Details (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, deprecated module; template this was used on is now a redirect. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 03:25, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support, per the nomination, as someone who's put a lot of effort into cleanup of the hatnote system. {{Nihiltres |talk |edits}} 20:30, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Other uses

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 July 5. Primefac (talk) 02:31, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Other_uses (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:For (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Distinguish

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 July 5. Primefac (talk) 02:31, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Module:Distinguish (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Module:Labelled_list_hatnote (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wyoming Sessions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 July 5. Primefac (talk) 02:30, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wyoming_Sessions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).